ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1239|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG39一个句子不会 求教!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-20 14:20:00 | 只看该作者

OG39一个句子不会 求教!

Despite these differences, however, early trading companies organized effectively in remarkably modern ways and merit further study as analogues of more modern structures.是什么成分阿?




Passage 39>>


The modern multinational corporation is described as having originated when the owner-managers of nineteenth-century British firms carrying on international trade were replaced by teams of salaried managers organized into hierarchies. Increases in the volume of transactions in such firms are commonly believed to have necessitated this structural change. Nineteenth-century inventions like the steamship and the telegraph, by facilitating coordination of managerial activities, are described as key factors. Sixteenth-and seventeenth-century chartered trading companies, despite


the international scope of their activities, are usually considered irrelevant to this discussion: the>>


volume of their transactions is assumed to have been too low and the communications and>>


transport of their day too primitive to make comparisons with modern multinationals interesting.>>


In reality, however, early trading companies successfully purchased and outfitted ships, built and>>


operated offices and warehouses, manufactured trade goods for use abroad, maintained trading


posts and production facilities overseas, procured goods for import, and sold those goods both at home and in other countries. The large volume of transactions associated with these activities


seems to have necessitated hierarchical management structures well before the advent of modern


communications and transportation. For example, in the Hudson’s Bay Company, each far-flung


trading outpost was managed by a salaried agent, who carried out the trade with the Native


Americans, managed day-to-day operations, and oversaw the post’s workers and servants. One


chief agent, answerable to the Court of Directors in London through the correspondence


committee, was appointed with control over all of the agents on the bay.


The early trading companies did differ strikingly from modern multinationals in many respects.


They depended heavily on the national governments of their home countries and thus


characteristically acted abroad to promote national interests. Their top managers were typically owners with a substantial minority share, whereas senior managers’ holdings in modern multinationals are usually insignificant. They operated in a pre-industrial world, grafting a system of capitalist international trade onto a pre-modern system of artisan and peasant production. Despite these differences, however, early trading companies organized effectively in remarkably modern ways and merit further study as analogues of more modern structures.

沙发
发表于 2005-12-20 15:14:00 | 只看该作者
merit 做动词,在这里是值得的意思,全句是“尽管有这些差异,早期的贸易公司仍然是以明显的现代组织方式在有效的运作,并且因为与现代公司结构的相似性值得进一步的研究”。

板凳
发表于 2006-1-8 10:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用brent_zhang在2005-12-20 15:14:00的发言:
merit 做动词,在这里是值得的意思,全句是“尽管有这些差异,早期的贸易公司仍然是以明显的现代组织方式在有效的运作,并且因为与现代公司结构的相似性值得进一步的研究”。


同意大张的。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-12 13:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部