Throughout the 1950’s, there were increases in the numbers of dead birds found in agricultural areas after pesticide sprayings. Pesticide manufacturers claimed that the publicity given to bird deaths stimulated volunteers to look for dead birds, and that the increase in numbers reported was attributable to the increase in the number of people looking.
Which of the following statements, if true, would help to refute the claim of the pesticide manufacturers?
(A) The publicity given to bird deaths was largely regional and never reached national proportions.
(B) Pesticide sprayings were timed to coincide with various phases of the life cycles of the insects they destroyed.
(C) No provision was made to ensure that a dead bird would not be reported by more than one observer.
(D) Initial increases in bird deaths had been noticed by agricultural workers long before any publicity had been given to the matter.(D)
(E) Dead birds of the same species as those found in agricultural areas had been found along coastal areas where no farming took place.
答案D.
虽然做对了,但是完全凭感觉。
题目本身的逻辑关系不是很理解。
杀虫剂生产商说的是什么呢?
死鸟数目的公开引起了更多的志愿者来寻找死鸟。报告的死鸟数目的增加归因于来寻找死鸟的人数的增加。
这是什么逻辑啊?死鸟数目的公开并不是引起更多志愿者来杀鸟啊!
生产商的言下之意,不就是,死鸟数目本来就挺多,只是以前没有发现而已,现在找死鸟的人多了,所以发现的多了。那D不是一个意思了吗?变成支持了。晕啊~ |