我在CR200做的一道Cr逻辑题总是觉得我选的蛮对的
Studies confirm that people who eatfish rich in omega-3 acids are generally healthier and have lower rate ofcardiovascular diseases than people who did not eat such fish. Now, plans are underway to add omega-3sto other foods, such as orange juice and bread, so that people can have the benefit of a dietrich in omega-3s without eating fish. Scientists have managed to add theomega-3s without adding the fishy smell or taste, thus making it more likelythat people will find products palatable.Which of the following would it be most useful to investigate inorder to determine whether the plan will achieve its goal of making peoplehealthier? A Whether people who eatfish tend to eat less foods that are likely to have a detrimental effect oncardiovascular health? B Whether eating fish is correlated with health benefits in additionto reduced risk of cardiovascular disease? C Whether potential health benefits will outweigh priceas a factor in consumers’ food-buying decisions? DWhether high concentration of Omega-3s occur naturally in foods other thanfish? E Whether people who avoid eating fish do so because of fish’s smell ortaste?
我选的是E真确答案是A 我理解的是题目的最后说了去掉鱼的气味会让这个尝起来更加好吃，所以才会有更多的人去吃才能达到他们的目标 那么我觉得E的正好，如果说大家因为鱼腥味不愿吃鱼无法获得omega 3那么现在没有了鱼腥味会有更多的人愿意吃omega-3 求助！！我真的不能理解了，绕不过弯了！
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2022-9-29 13:54:30
收藏
收藏
