[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day175

Ysandre · 发表于 2023-4-4 01:47:00

想带着大家每天坚持读逻辑，就拿来Source为鸡精的逻辑真题，每天带着大家打卡，希望大家能坚持每天学习+逻辑打卡；

大家可以在有限时间内阅读并分析逻辑链，本帖回复结构和猜测的答案方向，可以看看谁猜的准！大家都是大侦探！

每日的答案和结构在揽瓜阁逻辑群中更新

揽瓜阁逻辑群加群方式在本文末尾

考试群：

GMAT入群／揽瓜阁入群方式：https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html

揽瓜阁阅读精读（读什么文章，大家读过就懂了）：

https://forum.chasedream.com/forum-25-1.html

公众号：1.考什么试

2.商校百科

申请群

1. ChaseDream 2023 MBA 申请／校友答疑／面试群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-863011-1-1.html

2.英国，新加坡，美国，法国，加拿大，香港，德国商科申请群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1387919-1-1.html

3. 行业分享交流／职业规划群：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388171-1-1.html

小红书：

1.留学+考试最新消息关注妥妥妥了（小红书号：323014154）

2.求职+MBA 最新消息关注元（小红书号：895404330）

朋友们！揽瓜阁逻辑小分队重新上线啦～每日材料我们仍旧会发布在ChaseDream GMAT 逻辑版块。

为了响应大家想拉群专门讨论2022揽瓜阁逻辑的要求，我们设立了小范围的打卡群（仅针对确定会打卡的同学），现作出揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群入群流程如下：

1.完成小分队任意三日的逻辑打卡任务（需回帖并截图），指路：https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1388800-1-1.html

2.向小蓝鸡发送关键字：【揽瓜阁逻辑2022】并附上三次任务截图后耐心等待入群即可。

3. 本次小分队活动为纯公益性活动，为了督促大家学习，采取严格的打卡审查制度，连续三日不打卡的朋友会被无情清退。

⚠️重要提醒：如您还不是GMAT交流群群友，请先申请进入GMAT交流群后再申请进入揽瓜阁逻辑2022打卡群

最新鸡麦群入口：

https://forum.chasedream.com/thread-1382779-1-1.html

手机微信打开或者电脑网页打开均可，记得一定要登录再填，无需跳转APP

Day 175
1.       Ecosystem
V1说什么一个公司原来的抓scallop的方法很伤害ecosystem，现在有一个新的方法可以不伤害ecosystem,所以应该要用这个新的方法
问加强…
V2某海洋公司的”某个东西”(估计是船还是船桨什么的)会对一种生物和coral造成伤害,引起ecosystem的不平行,受到政府的罚款.所以这公司manager建议换一个新的这个东西,就能不会破坏生态平行和coral, 并且不会受到罚款, 降低公司成本…
问加强

2.       Winemaker
Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can leak, crumble, or became moldy, so that those winemakers must often discard a significant proportion of their inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster plastic stoppers, which cannot leak, crumble, or mold, have long been available to winemakers, at a price slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers. Cork prices, however are expected to rise dramatically in the near future. Clearly, therefore, winemakers who still use cork but wish to keep production costs from rising will be forced to reconsider plastic stoppers. And since the wine-buying public’s association of plastic stoppers with poor-quality wine is weakening, there is an excellent chance that the Bottlemaster plastic stopper will gain an increased share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A)    The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
B)    The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument.
C)    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.
D)    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a restatement of that main conclusion.
E)    The first is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is that main conclusion

3.       孩子的药
就是寂静中已经有的,那个政府为了鼓励在小孩身上做药检验而给医药企业颁布更长时期的 patent, 提干是说医药企业多在大人身上试验儿童用药,但是儿童和大人生理结构不一样,因此政府要鼓励在小孩身上用药,而医药企业的主要利润是来自 patent 期限,所以颁布更长的 patent 可以取得政府所要的结果。问的是假设

miawang00088 · 发表于 2023-4-4 07:34:16

miawang00088 · 发表于 2023-4-4 07:54:28

1. 新方法可以实施且实施后不伤害eco
换一个新的方法不罚款，降低公司成本：新方法除了不罚款外，成本也不超过之前方法
2. e
3. 颁布更长的patent可以增加药企的利润，会让药企在孩子身上用药实验

Erica2022 · 发表于 2023-4-4 09:29:03

Thanks

Nora小碗 · 发表于 2023-4-4 09:59:24

看一下！

Nora小碗 · 发表于 2023-4-4 10:02:22

看一下！

Nora小碗 · 发表于 2023-4-4 10:15:28

v1. 方向：其他优点
v2.方向：新的东西替换成本很低，不会对成本造成很大影响；新的东西没有维护成本

2.e

3.延长Patent会让企业更多选择在孩子身上做实验；延长了patent让在孩子身上做实验的这个事情时间上可行；延长了patent不会让企业为了利润最大化而选择时间更短花费更少的大人实验

Cocoboyxx · 发表于 2023-4-4 10:27:16

1. Ecosystem

V1说什么一个公司原来的抓scallop的方法很伤害ecosystem，现在有一个新的方法可以不伤害ecosystem,所以应该要用这个新的方法

问加强…

V2某海洋公司的”某个东西”(估计是船还是船桨什么的)会对一种生物和coral造成伤害,引起ecosystem的不平行,受到政府的罚款.所以这公司manager建议换一个新的这个东西,就能不会破坏生态平行和coral, 并且不会受到罚款, 降低公司成本…

问加强

F：某海洋公司的“某个东西”(估计是船还是船桨什么的)会对一种生物和coral造成伤害，引起ecosystem的不平衡，受到政府的罚款

P：？

C：公司manager建议换一个新的这个东西，就能不会破坏生态平行和coral, 并且不会受到罚款, 降低公司成本

Q：问加强

思路：新产品与旧产品相比的优点；

方向：新产品成本低使用方便；新产品使用起来效率不比旧产品低

2. Winemaker

Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can leak,crumble, or became moldy, so that those winemakers must often discard asignificant proportion of their inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster plasticstoppers, which cannot leak, crumble, or mold, have long been available towinemakers, at a price slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers.Cork prices, however are expected to rise dramatically in the near future.Clearly, therefore, winemakers who stilluse cork but wish to keep production costs from rising will be forced toreconsider plastic stoppers. And since the wine-buying public’s associationof plastic stoppers with poor-quality wine is weakening, there is an excellent chance that the Bottlemaster plastic stopper willgain an increased share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.

In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which ofthe following roles?

A) The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of aposition that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of theargument.

B) The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of aposition that the argument opposes; the second is conclusion drawn in order tosupport the main conclusion of the argument.

C) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the secondprovides evidence in support of that main conclusion.

D) The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is arestatement of that main conclusion.

E) The first is a conclusion drawn in order to support the mainconclusion of the argument; the second is that main conclusion

Q：黑脸问作用

思路：①非事实（evidence）②一个conclusion

选项：①中间结论 ②主结论 E

3.孩子的药

那个政府为了鼓励在小孩身上做药检验而给医药企业颁布更长时期的 patent，题干是说医药企业多在大人身上试验儿童用药，但是儿童和大人生理结构不一样，因此政府要鼓励在小孩身上用药，而医药企业的主要利润是来自 patent 期限，所以颁布更长的 patent 可以取得政府所要的结果。问的是假设

F：医药企业多在大人身上试验儿童用药，但是儿童和大人生理结构不一样，因此政府要鼓励在小孩身上用药

P：医药企业的主要利润是来自patent 期限

C：所以颁布更长的 patent 可以取得政府所要的结果

Q：问假设

思路：关联儿童药实验与patent期限延长

方向：儿童实验成本高，patent期限变长，预期利润变多，医药企业为了药品有足够的竞争力会投入更多资金进行儿童实验

顾周i · 发表于 2023-4-4 12:36:57

Mark一下！

顾周i · 发表于 2023-4-4 13:37:37

Day 175
1.       Ecosystem
V1说什么一个公司原来的抓scallop的方法很伤害ecosystem，现在有一个新的方法可以不伤害ecosystem,所以应该要用这个新的方法
问加强…
V2某海洋公司的”某个东西”(估计是船还是船桨什么的)会对一种生物和coral造成伤害,引起ecosystem的不平行,受到政府的罚款.所以这公司manager建议换一个新的这个东西,就能不会破坏生态平行和coral, 并且不会受到罚款, 降低公司成本…
问加强

方案题：新方法会不会伤害别的生物，然后间接导致生态系统不平衡
新方法的使用成本是否会过高吗——罚钱变少但是支出变多了

2.       Winemaker
Many winemakers use cork stoppers; but cork stoppers can leak, crumble, or became moldy, so that those winemakers must often discard a significant proportion of their inventory of bottled wine. Bottlemaster plastic stoppers, which cannot leak, crumble, or mold, have long been available to winemakers, at a price slightly higher than that of traditional cork stoppers. Cork prices, however are expected to rise dramatically in the near future. Clearly, therefore, winemakers who still use cork but wish to keep production costs from rising will be forced to reconsider plastic stoppers. And since the wine-buying public’s association of plastic stoppers with poor-quality wine is weakening, there is an excellent chance that the Bottlemaster plastic stopper will gain an increased share of the market for wine-bottle stoppers.
In the argument given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
A)    The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is the main conclusion of the argument.
B)    The first is a judgment that has been advanced in support of a position that the argument opposes; the second is conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument.
C)    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second provides evidence in support of that main conclusion.
D)    The first is the main conclusion of the argument; the second is a restatement of that main conclusion.
E)    The first is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion of the argument; the second is that main conclusion

E（第一句是中间结论，第二句是总结论）

3.       孩子的药
就是寂静中已经有的,那个政府为了鼓励在小孩身上做药检验而给医药企业颁布更长时期的 patent, 提干是说医药企业多在大人身上试验儿童用药,但是儿童和大人生理结构不一样,因此政府要鼓励在小孩身上用药,而医药企业的主要利润是来自 patent 期限,所以颁布更长的 patent 可以取得政府所要的结果。问的是假设

方案题：
方案可以达成目的，那么需要排他因（无他因干扰在小孩身上试验达成药物发明）

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day175

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()