ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1304|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

哭问 大全 I-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-10-6 10:26:00 | 只看该作者

哭问 大全 I-20

A light bulb company produces 2,000 light bulbs per week. The manager wants to ensure that standards of quality remain constant from week to week. The manager, therefore, claims that out of 2,000 light bulbs produced per week, 500 light bulbs are rejected.


Of the following, the best criticism of the manager’s plan is that the plan assumes that


(A) light bulb manufacturers cannot accept all light bulbs that produced


(B) the overall quality of the light bulbs would not be improved if the total number of light bulbs produced were reduced


(C) each light bulb that is reviewed is worthy of being reviewed


(D) it is difficult to judge the quality of a light bulbE


(E) the 1,500 light bulbs that are accepted will be of the same quality from week to week


弱问本题的题干是什么意思?我的理解是:下面哪个假设是最能批判(反对)manager计划的?请大虾帮忙指正,万分感激!!!!!

沙发
发表于 2005-10-6 11:03:00 | 只看该作者

问MANAGER做出了何种FALLACIOUS ASSUMPTION

板凳
发表于 2005-10-7 06:21:00 | 只看该作者

You understanding of the question is correct, the theme of the question is the same as the usual so-called fallacious assumption. The manager's claim will definitely fall apart if you try to deny the answer E.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 04:45
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部