ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Campaigning for election to provincial or state office frequently requires that a candidate spend much time and energy catering to the interests of national party officials who can help the candidate to win office. The elected officials who campaign for reelection while they are in office thus often fail to serve the interests of their local constituencies.

Which one of the following is an assumption made by the argument?

正确答案: A

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3391|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Lsat 20-2-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-9-1 09:09:00 | 只看该作者

Lsat 20-2-4

4. Campaigning for election to provincial or state office frequently requires that a candidate spend much time and energy catering to the interests of national party officials who can help the candidate to win office. The elected officials who campaign for reelection while they are in office thus often fail to serve the interests of their local constituencies.

Which one of the following is an assumption made-by the argument?

(A) Catering to the interests of national party officials sometimes conflicts with serving the interests of a provincial or state official's local constituencies.
(B) Only by catering to the interests of national party officials can those who hold provincial or state office win reelection.
(C) The interests of local constituencies are well served only by elected officials who do not cater to the interests of national party officials.
(D) Officials elected to provincial or state office are obligated to serve only the interests of constituents who belong to the same party as do the officials.
(E) All elected officials are likely to seek reelection to those offices that are not limited to one term.

the answer is A. actually,i think both of them are right, but "sometimes" in (a) made me change my mind and i chose (c).
i know there is a gap between "interests of national party officials" and "interests of their local constituencies", but don't know why (c) is not right. maybe the "well served" is not right? please give me some idea, thx
沙发
发表于 2003-9-1 22:34:00 | 只看该作者
The conclusion is "The elected officials who campaign for reelection while they are in office thus [[often]] fail to serve the interests of their local constituencies. "
A. Sometimes == Often
C. In my opinion, the fault is not on well served, but rather on the "only", it is too absolute. Because the tone of conclusion is "often", not the "necessarily".
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-9-3 09:38:00 | 只看该作者
我明白了。谢谢
C是充分条件, 而题目需必要条件。C取非不反对结论。C可以用来支持结论。A取非原结论不成立。 关键时刻忘了取非。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-22 22:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部