ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1887|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教一道逻辑题~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-12-13 00:17:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
During excavations for a highway, workers just uncovered a hoard of over 30,000 eighteenth-century gold coins. These coins, most in superb condition, are of a type that has long been quite rare and correspondingly highly valued. Several coins of the same date and type recently sold at auction for over $5,000 each, despite being in poor condition. Clearly, therefore, in today’s market, this hoard, if sold, is bound to bring in at least $150,000,000

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
(A)  The workers who uncovered the coins did not take for themselves a significant number of coins before reporting their find.
(B)  The hoard of coins would not bring in more if broken down into small parcels to be sold individually than if sold as a single quantity.
(C) The appearance on the market of thousands of additional coins of this type will not significantly affect the status of these coins as rarities.
(D)  It is not possible to determine whether the hoard of coins was buried by people who were then its legal owners.
(E)  Whoever might sell the coins would be sufficiently knowledgeable about such sales to secure the highest possible price for the coins.

答案是c,为什么d不可以呢,取非以后“(D)  It is  possible to determine whether the hoard of coins was buried by people who were then its legal owners.”
既然是别人的东西不就不能在市场上转手吗


希望有大牛可以解答一下




收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-12-13 01:02:26 | 只看该作者
想多了,人家说的钱,不要从可能性上入手
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-6 08:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部