|
逻辑小白，做第一道weaken就有了问题T.T...
在Bible中的weaken题型中，有一道题目
Nurse: Dr.Roark's patients tend to require far more time for recuperation than the patients of any other surgeon at Oceanside Hospital. Although she is reputed to be quite talented, Dr. Roark is clearly not as skilled as the other surgeons at Oceanside.
which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the nurse's argument?
(A) Dr. Roark's patients tend to require fewer procedures than those of other docotors in the hosptial.
答案上的解释是：A选项错误，因为A是支持原来的观点的。
原解析是这样说的：(This is an Opposite answer that strengths the claim that Dr.Roark is not as skilled as other surgeons by showing that Dr. Roark's patients required fewer procedures than the patients of other doctors. In general, one would expect that a patient with fewer procedures would require less recuperation time thana patrient that required a greater number of procedures )
我的理解是：选项中既然说了医生R的病人需要的手术次数（程序）少，也就意味着恢复的时间短→正好否定了premise句：R医生病人恢复时间长的情况(即R医生的恢复时间比其他医生的病人恢复时间长)→所以成功的否定了stimuli中的premise句→所以选择A是可以的 。
为什么选项中是说支持了argument？？（看上面的解析也没看懂，我认为是否定了stimuli，原文是支持了stimuli正好是反着的。）
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2019-1-16 18:12:08
收藏
收藏
楼主
