ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3200|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全2-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-9 18:20:00 | 只看该作者

大全2-5

5.     The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service. If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds.


The statements above best support the conclusion that


(A) the private firms that would handle public transportation would have experience in the transportation industry


(B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs


(C) private firms would receive government funding if it were needed to cover operating costs


(D) the public would approve the cost-cutting actions taken by the private firm


(E) the municipal government would not be resigned to accumulating merely enough income to cover costs



the key is B,


however why not C? would some one please help me out???



Thx a lot!


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-9 19:21:37编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-9-10 00:17:00 | 只看该作者
文中说If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds. 正说明了政府可以不用再负责给公共交通运营成本买单了,因为私营会用利润来解决。C说政府要给私营补贴,政府还是要掏钱啊。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-10 17:04:00 | 只看该作者

我把would看成了could,所以理解偏了,谢谢你的提示!


地板
发表于 2005-9-18 17:10:00 | 只看该作者
D为什么不对呢?题目说政府不能institute cost-saving reductions in service,为什么不能推出私营可以采取这些措施呢?
5#
发表于 2005-9-18 21:00:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用boluomeimei在2005-9-18 17:10:00的发言:
D为什么不对呢?题目说政府不能institute cost-saving reductions in service,为什么不能推出私营可以采取这些措施呢?


请注意,此题是归纳题:


point 1:The city’s public transportation system should be removed from the jurisdiction of the municipal government, which finds it politically impossible either to raise fares or to institute cost-saving reductions in service政府应该放弃公共交通,因为政府既不能提高收益,也不能节省开支


point 2: If public transportation were handled by a private firm, profits would be vigorously pursued, thereby eliminating the necessity for covering operating costs with government funds私营能够提高收益,继而不用政府继续补贴公共交通。


point1+2===> (B) political considerations would not prevent private firms from ensuring that revenues cover operating costs政府应该让私营来用收入覆盖运营成本


这样,是不是能看出来D的偏颇之处呢?

6#
发表于 2005-9-19 09:23:00 | 只看该作者

似乎明白了。。。。谢谢

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-1 00:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部