ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 4275|回复: 25
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[原始] 放狗--有无大龄在职党一起结个伴学习下

[精华] [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2018-2-23 18:10:56 来自手机 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
刚考完……语文好难…感觉比做Manhattan 模考时难…时间都来不及…55…
数学每次考都49,真不知考51啥感觉……
放狗攒人品…

Q:
考时想着给大家放点狗…结果考完大部分忘记了………
-补充JJ第三题,就那道水倾斜放在一个容器里的,一个条件是底面是个正方形。其他条件一样。求小h。当时想了半天没想起来三角形体积怎么求,还是没做出来,哭死…
- 一道新的:x non negative, 问 y positive?
条件一:X平方大于y平方
条件二:X+y=1
时间来不及了选了C,事后看看貌似不对…

V:
看到了JJ中的两篇…然而之前没认真研究…再哭一遍…
- 残余应力那篇,确认考古。大家看看考古里的英文原文,基本差不多。仔细研究下,都是细节题
- 南岛语系,确认考古。
- 还有篇没来的及做的…讲的Volunteer turnover 和embedded position的。没来得及做,所以讲什么完全没印象了…待考古吧…

AWA
- 作者结论是要投资房市而不是股市。因为:过去五年股市下跌,楼市涨;楼市预期后期还会涨;投资房子可以自己住,比股票有实际价值。

大龄在职党私我,一起勉励下…准备两年多了…还是没考出来…进步缓慢…呃…
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2018-2-23 18:18:44 | 只看该作者
板凳
发表于 2018-2-23 18:20:28 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
地板
发表于 2018-2-23 18:24:23 | 只看该作者
考古by XYXB[考友已确认考古]
V1
关键字:embeddedness
两段1:先让步,一般认为:satisfactory(员工满意度)还有一个什么因素是员工离职与否的决定因素.然后,转折说embeddedness是另一个决定因素,然后就列举了embeddedness的三个因素
P2:转折,但是embeddedness不仅能够促进员工留住,而且也有可能促进员工离职.然后是列举了两种情况:1)connection使得员工有更多机会去了解新的工作机会,从而离职;2)embeddedness可能会使得员工在公司和家庭之间产生矛盾.
V2
关于员工跳槽的文章(3大段,超长),解释人们为什么跳槽,先提出解释embeddedness的3个因素,然后有个S还有一个B,(人名的确是S和B!,让我印象特别深刻)提出解释embeddedness的另外2个因素,文章不难,至少没有生词。应该是先提出3个老因素,然后再2个新因素。
关键词:embeddednessin people turnover of job
问题(1)主题题 (2)in order to 题 (3)except细节。
V3
(1)主题题 注意作者TS的语气,有无强转折,强对比等
(2)in order to 题
(3)except细节 (参考:有可能是近似原文里的第三四两段的小列举)
(4)问到哪一个原因最least导致跳槽,答案有
A. the job is required to travel a lot
B. employee joins company’s soccer team
C. employee considers company as his/her community’sbig part (JJ作者选)(可参考5段首句)
D. employee feels comfortable working for company,blabla
E. <can’t remember>

近似原文:(经当年的考友鉴定,原文并没有那么长,但是关键的句子下面都包括了)
注:括号内的内容为当年的牛人“八神”的补充
According to Mitchell et al. (2001), jobembeddedness represents a broad cluster of ideas that influence an employee'schoice to remain in a job, operating like a net or a web in which an individualbecomes enmeshed. A person who is highly embedded has many connections within aperceptual life space (Lewin, 1951). Moreover, a person can become enmeshed orembedded in a variety of ways (both on and off the job). The critical aspectsof job embeddedness are the extent to which the job is similar to or fits withthe other aspects in their life space, the extent to which the person has linksto other people or activities, and the ease with which links can bebroken--what they would give up if they left. These dimensions are called fit,links and sacrifice. Less concerned with the influence of any one specificconnection, job embeddedness focuses on the overall level of connectedness(Mitchell et al., 2001).
(介绍工作嵌入度的三个方面:fit (适合), links(联系) and sacrifice(损失)
According to the theory of job embeddedness (Mitchell, Holtom and Lee, 2001),an employee's personal values, career goals and plans for the future must fitwith the larger corporate culture and the demands of his or her immediate job(e.g., job knowledge, skills and abilities). In addition, a person willconsider how well he or she fits the community and surrounding environment. Jobembeddedness assumes that the better the fit, the higher the likelihood that anemployee will feel professionally and personally tied to the organization.
(讲第一方面----fit(适合),员工的个人价值,职业目标和未来计划必须与公司文化以及他/她个人的工作相一致,也就是fit。员工自己也会考虑自己是否fit其所属团体与环境。越fit,员工越有归属感,越不会跳槽。)
Job embeddedness theory suggests that a number of threads link an employee andhis or her family in a social, psychological, and financial web that includeswork and non-work friends, groups, the community, and the physical environmentwhere they are located. The greater the number of links between the person andthe web, the more likely an employee will stay in a job (Mitchell et al.,2001).
(讲第二方面----Link(联系)。与方方面面联系越紧密,员工越愿意留在公司。)(注意这段的小列举)
The concept of sacrifice represents the perceived cost of material orpsychological benefits that are forfeited by organizational departure. Forexample, leaving an organization may induce personal losses (e.g., losingcontact with friends, personally relevant projects, or perks). The more anemployee will have to give up when leaving, the more difficult it will be tosever employment with the organization (Shaw et al., 1998). Examples includenon-portable benefits, like stock options or defined benefit pensions, as wellas potential sacrifices incurred through leaving an organization like jobstability and opportunities for advancement (Shaw et al., 1998). Similarly,leaving a community where they are highly involved in local organizations canbe difficult for employees.
(讲第三方面----sacrifice(损失)。员工在各方面损失越大,越不愿跳槽)(注意这段的小列举)
One key area where job embeddedness complements traditional approaches tovoluntary turnover is community attachment. The model explicitly considers theimpact of both organizational and community influences on the three jobembeddedness dimensions. Put differently, each of the three dimensions--fit,links and sacrifice--has organizational and community components, which aresummarized in Table 2. In two reported tests, Mitchell, Lee and colleagues(Mitchell et al., 2001; Lee et al., 2004) have demonstrated that jobembeddedness predicts variance in voluntary turnover over and above job satisfaction.
(讲job embeddedness(工作嵌入度)对理解主动跳槽有一个重要的补充,这就是归属感。Jobembeddness模型认为组织(偏公)和社团(偏私)对job embeddedness的三个方面------fit, links and sacrifice都有影响。模型作者认为:在预测员工“主动跳槽”方面,job embeddedness比job satisfaction更有优势。)
To date, job embeddedness has been tested in the hospital, grocery and bankingindustries. To extend the generalizability of the model, we propose to test itacross multiple, diverse industries. Thus, the following hypotheses replicateMitchell et al.'s findings:

Hypothesis 1: Job embeddedness is negativelycorrelated with voluntary turnover (主动跳槽).
(工作嵌入度越高,员工越不愿跳槽. Jobembeddedness 和turnover是 反比关系)
Hypothesis 2: Job embeddedness improves theprediction of voluntary turnover above and beyond that accounted for by jobsatisfaction(工作满意度).
(job embeddedness工作嵌入度的大小,对员工跳槽的影响要超过job satisfaction工作满意度大小对员工跳槽的影响。)
5#
发表于 2018-2-23 18:30:16 | 只看该作者
ziyuenlau 发表于 2018-2-23 18:24
考古by XYXB[考友已确认考古]
V1
关键字:embeddedness

感谢!
6#
发表于 2018-2-23 19:19:26 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主!!!

x non negative, 问 y positive?
条件一:X平方大于y平方
条件二:X+y=1

选E?
举例{x=1,y=0}
7#
发表于 2018-2-23 23:25:18 来自手机 | 只看该作者
构筑,我也是今天下午考,5点场。在职党,硕士毕业都7年。二战,620,Q47V28。不准备再考了,太难了,语文连蒙带猜。JJ确实遇到几题,建议大家还是看一下,至少确保有思路
8#
发表于 2018-2-23 23:28:10 | 只看该作者
感谢分享!               
9#
发表于 2018-2-23 23:31:40 来自手机 | 只看该作者
感觉题目难度比prep破解和官方模拟都要难。做那些模拟题,我660-700之间。今天考得也是醉了,尤其verbal,完全奔溃
10#
发表于 2018-2-23 23:32:11 | 只看该作者
Hi 你好 同大龄在职,坐标上海。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-9 18:04
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部