头晕了，连这道题都看不懂了，大哥大姐们救救我吧？？？ 大全-2-16

16.   Advertiser: The revenue that newspapers and magazines earn by publishing advertisements allows publishers to keep the prices per copy of their publications much lower than would otherwise be possible. Therefore, consumers benefit economically from advertising.

Consumer: But who pays for the advertising that pays for low-priced newspapers and magazines? We consumers do, because advertisers pass along advertising costs to us through the higher prices they charge for their products.

Which of the following best describes how the consumer counters the advertiser’s argument?

(A) By alleging something that, if true, would weaken the plausibility of the advertiser’s conclusion

(B) By questioning the truth of the purportedly factual statement on which the advertiser’s conclusion is based

(C) By offering an interpretation of the advertiser’s opening statement that, if accurate, shows that there is an implicit contradiction in it

(D) By pointing out that the advertiser’s point of view is biased（A）

(E) By arguing that the advertiser too narrowly restricts the discussion to the effects of advertising that are economic

这种题型ETS会考吗？？？

广告商：因为在杂志上做广告，付给杂志社广告费，所以顾客买杂志便宜。

顾客：因为我们在买东西时已经付了广告费了，所以我们买杂志应该便宜。

我认为是顾客给出他因，来weaken广告商。

请大家指正。

心态放平和一点，抓住自己最主要的问题是关键，找到搞懂一道题的感觉时心情就会舒服很多了。

以下是引用ysc在2005-4-27 20:46:00的发言：

广告商：因为在杂志上做广告，付给杂志社广告费，所以顾客买杂志便宜。

顾客：因为我们在买东西时已经付了广告费了，所以我们买杂志应该便宜。

我认为是顾客给出他因，来weaken广告商。

请大家指正。

我认为是直接否掉结论：

广告商：因为我付给杂志社广告费，所以杂志社降低杂志零售价，结论：消费者因广告商而获得经济利益。

顾客：我们在买你们（广告商）的高价产品时，相当于多支付了广告费了（消费者没有因广告商而获得经济利益。）

因此，是直接否掉广告商的结论