ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5219|回复: 17
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-17-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-11-12 11:52:00 | 只看该作者

gwd-17-11

Q11:


Some species of Arctic birds are threatened by recent sharp increases in the population of snow geese, which breed in the Arctic and are displacing birds of less vigorous species.  Although snow geese are a popular quarry for hunters in the southern regions where they winter, the hunting season ends if and when hunting has reduced the population by five percent, according to official estimates.  Clearly, dropping this restriction would allow the other species to recover.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?




  • Hunting limits for snow geese were imposed many years ago in response to a sharp decline in the population of snow geese.

  • It has been many years since the restriction led to the hunting season for snow geese being closed earlier than the scheduled date.

  • The number of snow geese taken by hunters each year has grown every year for several years.

  • As their population has increased, snow geese have recolonized wintering grounds that they had not used for several seasons.

  • In the snow goose’s winter habitats, the goose faces no significant natural predation.

  •   


    请高人指点,谢谢!

    沙发
    发表于 2005-11-12 12:18:00 | 只看该作者

    探讨一下,我选d。


    文章说结论说geese被猎杀的这段时间给了其他物种休养生息的时间。问削弱。d说由于geese太多了,扩张到了原来不去(也就是猎人也不去)的地方。那其他物种当然还会受到这些没受损伤的geese的危害。

    板凳
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-12 12:38:00 | 只看该作者
    我也选D, 可是答案是B
    地板
    发表于 2005-11-12 12:53:00 | 只看该作者
    me too
    5#
    发表于 2005-11-12 16:28:00 | 只看该作者

    顶!


    B怎么削弱啊?

    6#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-12 22:45:00 | 只看该作者

    请哪位牛牛帮一下忙?

    7#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-13 12:03:00 | 只看该作者
    8#
     楼主| 发表于 2005-11-13 23:29:00 | 只看该作者
    DING
    9#
    发表于 2005-12-16 00:47:00 | 只看该作者

    事情或许是这样的:


    1。文章认为geese多了是bird少了原因


    2。又认为存在狩猎限制是geese多了的原因


    3。b指出,其实这个狩猎限制其实很多年没有被打破过了(狩猎量都未超过5%),所以,现在即使打破了限制,狩猎量也不一定会超过5%,故不一定会减少geese,增加bird


    请指教

    10#
    发表于 2006-2-17 10:28:00 | 只看该作者
    试着解释一下,

    A, 5%的规定是在若干年前基于SG大量减少的情况下制定的,也就是说和现在情况不同,应该被drop,间接支持.

    B, 在过去的很多年里,打猎季节通常都结束的比预计的早,也就是说5%的减少没有达到,也可以联想是猎人没什么兴趣打猎,总之是根本达不到restriction的5%, 所以, drop这个restriction没有实际意义,从而削弱.

    C, 支持. 每年都增多,如果5%不变,就是因为SG的量大了. 至多是个支持.

    D, 无关.

    E. 无关,注意说的是natural predation, hunting不是natural predation.
    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 23:22
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部