[求助]gwd24-7

GWD-24-7

Which of the following most logically completes
the argument below?

The expansion of large-scale farming in Africa
and Asia has destroyed much of the natural
vegetation on which elephants have historically depended, forcing them to turn
to cultivated land to satisfy their enormous appetites. As a result, farmers
have lost millions of dollars worth of crops annually. Yet even if elephant
sanctuaries were created on a widespread basis to guarantee elephants
sufficient natural vegetation, the raiding would likely persist, since            

1. when
        elephants forage for food, they typically travel in herds.
2. Foraging
        elephants have been known to cause substantial damage even to plants that
        they do not eat.
3. Some
        of the land where crops have suffered extensive damage from elephants has
        been allowed to return to its natural state.
4. Elephants
        tend to prefer cultivated crops to wild vegetation as a food source.
5. Elephant
        sanctuaries are usually created in areas that are rich in the natural
        vegetation on which elephants have historically depended.

条件:大象救助所提供食物 结论:大象不再袭击庄稼.现要削弱说大象偏爱庄稼比起野生植物.说明即使有救助所提供basis大象还是会攻击农田因为其爱吃庄稼.给出他因削弱.B无关选项

这道题谁可以帮忙解释一下，我也不明白为什么B不可以？

这题跟GWD5-29很类似

某某一直喜欢A,可是现实致使他忍痛离开了A,接受了B。

后来A又出现了，但是人们觉得某某和A肯定不会长久，因为某某已经喜欢上B了。

不好意思，举了这么个恶俗的例子

其实感觉上只能说D的逻辑关系更直接,我选了C,我认为d虽然说大象喜欢吃c多过吃d,但也有可能大象庇护所里也就喂的是c啊

而只有放出来的大象有raid的可能性。

不过这个吗，还是想听听nn的说法

请问这道题 E为什么错了？

E的意思不是说避难说建在了天然蔬菜（大象依赖）比较丰富的地方？而不是建在了天然蔬菜被破坏的地方，所以没起到预期的效果