ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1122|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG15 ,32求助

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2015-12-16 12:18:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
last year the rate of inflation was 1.2 percent, but for the current year it has been 4 percent. We can conclude
that inflation is on an upward trend and the rate will be still higher next year.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion above?
(A) The inflation figures were computed on the basis of a representative sample of economic data rather than
all of the available data.
(B) Last year a dip in oil prices brought inflation temporarily below its recent stable annual level of 4 percent.
(C) Increases in the pay of some workers are tied to the level of inflation, and at an inflation rate of 4 percent
or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation.
(D) The 1.2 percent rate of inflation last year represented a 10-year low.
(E) Government intervention cannot affect the rate of inflation to any significant degree.
正确答案是B
B选项没有问题是个他因,对于C有点问题
想了一会把自己给绕晕了,根据C,高于4 percent,会导致inflation上涨,为啥不能削弱啊?
题干说,去年1.2 今年4,根据这个趋势明年会继续涨。那么根据C是工资压力导致了inflation上涨为啥不能作为他因来削弱呢?
求指教!


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2015-12-16 15:25:08 | 只看该作者
Conclusion中,更进一步的上涨是根据1.2到4这个过程得出来的
所以B选项直接攻击了这个过程,说去年1.2是因为石油价格的原因,是非常规的

C选项的工资,后一句说在通胀率4或更高的时候,才能导致进一步的上涨,和1.2并没有产生联系,所以并不能当作他因
板凳
发表于 2015-12-16 15:41:40 | 只看该作者
and at an inflation rate of 4 percent or above, these pay raises constitute a force causing further inflation

C说当通胀率>=4%时,会引起进一步通货膨胀,这个加强了题干,而不是削弱。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2015-12-17 06:26:50 | 只看该作者
多谢啦!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-25 14:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部