ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3148|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-3-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-8-27 11:20:00 | 只看该作者

大全-3-4


Which of the following best completes the passage below?

Sales campaigns aimed at the faltering personal computer market have strongly emphasized ease of use, called user-friendliness. This emphasis is oddly premature and irrelevant in the eyes of most potential buyers, who are trying to address the logically prior issue of whether----

(A) user-friendliness also implies that owners can service their own computers
(B) personal computers cost more the more user-friendly they are
(C) currently available models are user-friendly enough to suit them
(D) the people promoting personal computers use them in their own homes
(E) they have enough sensible uses for a personal computer to justify the expense of buying one

选E,我选成了B.

不是很明白这道题的逻辑关系.新东方上课时,费费的讲解是说"logically prior issue"是指必要条件,所以选项要跳出user-friendliness的层次.而A,C,D都是局限于user-friendliness,所以错.B错是因为price与user-friendliness无关.(E不是也说的expense的问题吗?~~)

看得一头雾水,大家帮着分析分析.谢谢~~~



沙发
发表于 2003-8-27 19:00:00 | 只看该作者
prior issue of most potential buyers:值不值

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-27 21:38:00 | 只看该作者
好像明白了些......不过,逻辑题可以只从常识上考虑吗?~~
我本来试着按费费说的必要条件什么的逻辑关系进行推理,结果越推越迷惑~~
地板
发表于 2003-8-27 22:04:00 | 只看该作者
sometimes you should know what is required condition and what is sufficient condition..
for example, when the passage talk about "only if, assumption, unless..."

but in this passage, "prior" means a comparision..therefore,you don't need to think about what is required condition and what is sufficient condition...

in this passage, you should finish the passage by providing a reason why sales person should not emphasize on the the user-friendly characteristic of computers..

b is wrong because without addition information we can't clearly explain the reason why sales persons should not emphasize on the user-friendly characteristic..for example, if people care more about user-friendly than money, we can't use B as an reason to explain the argument...

e tells  us that comsumers concen more about whether the cost of user-friendly computes worth the expense, and therefore give an explanation to the conclusion the arguer makes..
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2003-8-27 22:21:00 | 只看该作者
太谢谢叼奶嘴的Albert了!!!明白得不能再明白了!!!
最近weaken练得太多了,忘了填空题解释题都是不需要什么推理的~~
汗~~
谢谢两位牛牛的指点!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 12:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部