ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1221|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT3-4-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-6-17 14:26:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT3-4-4

找了好久发现之前只有一个帖子讨论了这个题,还没看明白,回复也没人理

4 It is more desirable to have some form of socialized medicine than s system of medical care relying on the private sector. Socialized medicine is more broadly accessible than is private-sector system. In addition, since countries with socialized medicine have a lower infant morality rate than do countries with a system relying entirely on the private sector, socialized medicine seems to be technologically superior.

Which one of the following best indicates a flaw in the argument about the technological superiority of socialized medicine?

(A) The lower infant mortality rate might be due to the systems allowing greater access to Medical care

(B) There is no necessary connection between the economic system of socialism and Technological achievement.

(C) Infant mortality is a reliable indicator of the quality of medical care for children.

(D) No list is presented of the countries whose infant mortality statistics are summarized under the two categories, “socialized” and “private-sector”.

(E) The argument presupposes the desirability of socialized medicine, which is what the Argument seeks to-establish.
答案是A

我明白A可以说明婴儿死亡率低的原因不一定是技术先进,但是不明白原文到底哪个是结论啊?看完原文,我认为社会医疗的技术更先进是结论,社会医疗的是否更可得,婴儿死亡率是否更低跟这个结论没有必然联系,所以就选了b,尽管觉得economic system of socialism也不太对,但是a选项没说明greater access跟技术先进没关系啊???

是不是又是我的阅读问题,原文的前两句压根跟后面的技术先进的结论没关系,所以不存在是原文的flaw的问题?

请大家指教图片点击可在新窗口打开查看图片点击可在新窗口打开查看图片点击可在新窗口打开查看

沙发
发表于 2008-7-1 03:18:00 | 只看该作者
Premise 1: countries with socialized medicine have a lower infant morality rate
than do countries with a system relying entirely on the private sector
Premise 2: Socialized medicine is more broadly accessible

Conclusion: socialized medicine seems to be technologically superior

Answer A weaken the the premise and conclusion connection by providing additional reason

In B, economic system of socialism and Technological achievement is not even mentioned in the stimulus. Out of scope!
板凳
发表于 2008-7-4 01:04:00 | 只看该作者

Pay attention to the "GAP". Authors says low infant morality is sufficient to show a country is technologically superior.

If you can show low infant morality is due to something else, then you are weakening the connection between low morality and technology.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 08:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部