ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2087|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-10-15

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-12 11:10:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-10-15

没有人问过?自己实在太弱了


Q15:
Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
Although the number of large artificial satellites orbiting the Earth is small compared to
the number of small pieces of debris in orbit, the large satellites interfere more seriously
with telescope observations because of the strong reflections they produce. Because
many of those large satellites have ceased to function, the proposal has recently been
made to eliminate interference from nonfunctioning satellites by exploding them in space.
This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since _______.



A. many nonfunctioning satellites remain in orbit for years



B. for satellites that have ceased to function, repairing them while they are in orbit
would be prohibitively expensive



C. there are no known previous instances of satellites’ having been exploded on
purpose


D. the only way to make telescope observations without any interference from debris
in orbit is to use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth



E. a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit would result in a blanket of reflections that would make certain valuable telescope observations impossible


为什么是E不是D?


E说的 particles 是由于exploding产生的吗?题目好象没有说明啊.感觉E是无关啊?而D说要避免干扰只有use telescopes launched into extremely high orbits around the Earth.也就是说 exploding不管用.


请NN指点.


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-13 09:25:00 | 只看该作者

顶.帮帮我吧

板凳
发表于 2005-7-13 10:12:00 | 只看该作者
D只是给出了一个信息,这个信息是有利还是有害,你不能从原文得出啊。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-13 10:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用携隐在2005-7-13 10:12:00的发言:
D只是给出了一个信息,这个信息是有利还是有害,你不能从原文得出啊。


不能同意,我有2个问题


1. 原文说要减少干扰.D不正说了唯一的方法来减少干扰,从而得出别的方法不正确吗?


2. 怎么得出E中的颗粒就是爆炸产生的呢?


请NN指点.我月底就考了

5#
发表于 2005-7-13 11:16:00 | 只看该作者

题目是问:This proposal, however, is ill conceived, since.......


选项D 给出了the only way to make telescope observations without any interference, 但是没有说明为什么 explode nonfunctioning satellites 的proposal是ill conceived, 所以-无关


选项E a greatly increased number of small particles in Earth’s orbit 正是给出了如果explode nonfunctioning satellites 的后果就是make certain valuable telescope observations impossible来说明the proposal is ill conceived.

6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-13 11:52:00 | 只看该作者
请问 ill conceived 在这里怎么解释啊
7#
发表于 2005-7-13 20:27:00 | 只看该作者

我的理解是: ill conceived = poorly conceived, 就是argue那个proposal是在不缜密的构思下得出的,所以如果实施的话就会带来危害, 正如选项E所描述的情况


8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-13 22:04:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用deepshock_man在2005-7-13 20:27:00的发言:

我的理解是: ill conceived = poorly conceived, 就是argue那个proposal是在不缜密的构思下得出的,所以如果实施的话就会带来危害, 正如选项E所描述的情况



这样我就明白了。 谢谢

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-28 23:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部