原题如下 At present the Hollywood Restauranthas only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent theHollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seatingwould afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long asdiners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with hightables and stools, its profits would increase. The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason tobelieve that it is likely that (A) some celebrities come to theHollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if theywere available (B) the price of meals ordered bycelebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any,they spend lingering over their meals (C) a customer of the Hollywood whowould choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalizationabout lingering (D) a restaurant's customers whospend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than thosewho remain at their meals longer (E) with enough tall tables toaccommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, therewould be no view except of other tall tables
不是很明白问题问的是什么?是指如下哪种说法会削弱结论还是问作者assumption不对在哪儿吗?之前做题还没有碰到过看不懂题目的,也没有找到好好的解释,谢谢各位同仁啦
|