ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1198|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

l11-4-23,不知我的理解是否正确,请帮忙指教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-7-13 11:25:00 | 只看该作者

l11-4-23,不知我的理解是否正确,请帮忙指教

23.   Throughout European history famines have generally been followed by period of rising wages, because when a labor force is diminished, workers are more valuable in accordance with the law of supply and demand. The Irish potato famine of the 1840s is an exception; it resulted in the death or emigration of half of Ireland’s population, but there was no significant rise in the average wages in Ireland in the following decade.


Which one of the following, if true, would LEAST contribute to an explanation of the exception to the generalization?


(A) Improved medical care reduced the mortality rate among able-bodied adults in the decade following the famine to below prefamine levels.


(B) Eviction policies of the landowners in Ireland were designed to force emigration of the elderly and infirm, who could not work, and to retain a high percentage of able-bodied workers.


(C) Advances in technology increased the efficiency of industry and agriculture, and so allowed maintenance of economic output with less demand for labor.


(D) The birth rate increased during the decade following the famine, and this compensated for much of the loss of population that was due to the famine.D


               (E) England, which had political control of Ireland, legislated artificially low wages to  provide English-owned industry and agriculture in Ireland with cheap labor.


D不能解释原文中的矛盾现象,是不是因为出生率虽然提高并补偿了部分的人口损失,但这些新生的婴儿不能马上成为劳动力,所以对劳动力市场的供给是没有影响的。


不知我的理解是不是正确,请指教,先谢了!

沙发
发表于 2005-7-13 23:57:00 | 只看该作者
I support your explanation.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-15 11:33:00 | 只看该作者
Thank you, mygoalusa, and my goal is also USA
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 20:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部