[求助]OG-78，谢谢！

78.

A group of children of various ages was read stories in which people caused harm, some of those people doing so intentionally, and some accidentally. When asked about appropriate punishments for those who had caused harm, the younger children, unlike the older ones, assigned punishments that did not vary according to whether the harm was done intentionally or accidentally. Younger children, then, do not regard people’s intentions as relevant to punishment.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion above?

(A) In interpreting these stories, the listeners had to draw on a relatively mature sense of human psychology in order to tell whether harm was produced intentionally or accidentally.

(B) In these stories, the severity of the harm produced was clearly stated.

(C) Younger children are as likely to produce harm unintentionally as are older children.

(D) The older children assigned punishment in a way that closely resembled the way adults had assigned punishment in a similar experiment.

(E) The younger children assigned punishments that varied according to the severity of the harm done by the agents in the stories.

原文（执果索因，因果型）

前提（现象）：年轻小孩punishments 不会根据 harm（intentionall或者accidentally）变化

结论（原因）：年轻小孩认为intention和punishments无关

Ａ：年轻小孩没有成熟感觉－－＞不能区分harm（intentionall或者accidentally）－－＞punishments 不会根据 harm（intentionall或者accidentally）变化（他因weaken ）

Ｂ：punishments （可能）根据 harm（ severity）变化－－＞punishments 不会根据 harm（intentionall或者accidentally）变化

Ｅ：punishments （实际上）根据 harm（ severity）变化－－＞punishments 不会根据 harm（intentionall或者accidentally）变化

那么，Ｂ和Ｅ不是也是他因weaken 吗？为什么ＯＧ上说是support？请大牛帮忙，我想了3个小时就是不明白，谢谢！

B与E说的都是关于serverity，确实都加强了原命题的论证。都是support。

B中说serverity被清楚的说明了，E中说younger children 主要看serverity的严重程度来assign punishment，这不都是说younger children 确实不管主观还是不主观，只看serverity吗？

我好象有点明白了：

年轻小孩punishments 不会根据 harm（intentionall或者accidentally）变化－－＞intention无关

B与E说的都是与serverity有关－－＞intention无关，所以它因support原文，是这样的吗？