ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1011|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TEST-04-LR-02-

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-6-9 09:57:00 | 只看该作者

TEST-04-LR-02-

The journalistic practice of fabricating remarks after an interview and printing them within quotation marks, as if they were the interviewee's own words, has been decried as a form of unfair.



Misrepresentation. However, people's actual spoken remarks rarely convey their ideas as clearly as does a distillation of those ideas crafted, after an interview, by a skilled writer. Therefore, since this practice avoids the more serious misrepresentation that would occur if people's exact words were quoted but their defensible.



Which one of the following is a questionable technique used in the argument?



(A) answering an exaggerated charge by undermining the personal authority of those who made that charge .


(B) claiming that the prestige of a profession provides ample grounds for dismissing criticisms of that profession.


(C) Offering as an adequate defense of a practice an observation that discredits only one of several possible alternatives to that practice.


(D) concluding that a practice is right on the grounds that it is necessary.


(E) using the opponent's admission that a practice is sometimes appropriate as conclusive proof that that practice is never inappropriate.



The key is C. I don't get it. I chose D, I think the second paragraph tries to say that practice of fabricate remarks is necessary, if it is not being used, things would even get worse, therefore, I chose D.

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-15 02:22:00 | 只看该作者
Ding Yi Xia.
板凳
发表于 2005-6-15 10:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mygoalusa在2005-6-9 9:57:00的发言:

The journalistic practice of fabricating remarks after an interview and printing them within quotation marks, as if they were the interviewee's own words, has been decried as a form of unfair.



Misrepresentation. However, people's actual spoken remarks rarely convey their ideas as clearly as does a distillation of those ideas crafted, after an interview, by a skilled writer. Therefore, since this practice avoids the more serious misrepresentation that would occur if people's exact words were quoted but their defensible.



Which one of the following is a questionable technique used in the argument?



(A) answering an exaggerated charge by undermining the personal authority of those who made that charge .


(B) claiming that the prestige of a profession provides ample grounds for dismissing criticisms of that profession.


(C) Offering as an adequate defense of a practice an observation that discredits only one of several possible alternatives to that practice.


(D) concluding that a practice is right on the grounds that it is necessary.


(E) using the opponent's admission that a practice is sometimes appropriate as conclusive proof that that practice is never inappropriate.



The key is C. I don't get it. I chose D, I think the second paragraph tries to say that practice of fabricate remarks is necessary, if it is not being used, things would even get worse, therefore, I chose D.


之于D,文中不是necessary的问题;即便往D选项这个方向想,题目陈述的是which practice is more clearly的问题,见


However, people's actual spoken remarks rarely convey their ideas as clearly as does a distillation of those ideas crafted, after an interview, by a skilled writer.



这个不是questionable的地方,所以D是不对的。




[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-15 10:58:51编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-6-15 10:52:00 | 只看该作者

文中used technique的questionable在于“以特殊见之普遍”,也就是C选项中的adequate的问题。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 22:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部