ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2960|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

AIA34集思广益中参与讨论提高自己惠及他人

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-16 21:34:00 | 只看该作者

AIA34集思广益中参与讨论提高自己惠及他人

这个确实很不好写。我写的如下聊做参考。希望大家给出自己的观点或者文章进一步探讨


A34. “An employee should not publicize a company’s ethical violations if doing so could harm the company.”


No matter which domain it is in, the final target of a certain company is to pursue the maximum profit.  Compared to this pivotal objective, everything else is supplementary and subordinate. It is likely the case that sometimes the company may violate the ethics in order to achieve the maximum profit goal. At this point of time, the employees can really be confronted to a dilemma: to publicize or not to publicize. The author asserts that the employee should not publicize the violation if such activity may harm the company. To the contrary, others may hold the opposite idea. I think to simply claim should or should not is very imprudent. In my view, however, each of these alternatives is viable in certain circumstances and the practical criterion to make the decision is the correlated law rather than ethical standards.











To begin with, ethics is not clear and definite to serve as a criterion. Different people hold different values due to their respective background, thus have different ethical standards. Some one may judge it to be violation of the ethics while others may not, concerning one activity of the company. In fact, any company is considered to have committed pollution more or less thereby violate the ethics as to those most moral people. Should all employees of all companies to publicize this so-called violation of the ethics? The answer is apparently no.





Compared to its counterpart, law is much more feasible to function as a criterion. First, the procedures of the legislation determine that the law represents the majority’s ethical standards and can be well accepted by the public. Moreover, any legal provision is concrete and clarified which will bring no controversy. To publicize the violation of the law instead of the violation of the ethics is obviously a better and more practical choice for the employees of a company.





Admittedly, there is a lag between the legislation and some serious violations of ethics. However, after considering the pros and cons, it is still reasonable to use the law as a criterion. A solution can be to make the legislators work more efficiently.





In conclusion, whether the employees should publicize the violation of ethics of their company depends on whether the company violates the correlated law at the same time. Due to the above-mentioned reasons, the employees should let the public know the violation of ethics when the company disobeys the law at the same time, or vice versa.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-2 18:43:24编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-5-18 10:10:00 | 只看该作者
感谢judy为大家提供的范文,对,是这个词
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-5-18 10:49:00 | 只看该作者

皮杰太夸张了呵呵

在这里回答你的问题希望你不会介意哦

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=26&ID=65455

呵呵非常有帮助基本可以解决你的问题,不管是短期速成还是对其他准备长期备战的XDJM都很有指导意义。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-6-2 18:45:00 | 只看该作者

AIA34以前有人问过


这个是我写的文


提纲就不写了,希望大家继续讨论

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 17:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部