[求助]OG-6-35

請問各位前輩及大牛們,你們都是怎樣作MAIN IDEA題型的,我在牛人心經中曾見到有人提到他針對了各種文章組織架構作總結,所以我想他應該也跟我學過一樣的方法,比如說利用判斷該篇文章乃CONTRAST型的組織架構,所以在作MAIN IDEA時一定會注意答案裡面有沒有提到至少對比兩種觀念,不過這個方法對我而言最大的問題就在我常常判斷不準確,不知道有哪位前輩已經用這種方法總結過OG的能指點我一下到底ANALYSIS型跟ARGUMENT型要怎麼分(如果可以的話能告訴我每篇的結構嗎),像OG6,7,8篇我就實在分不出他用的是那種寫法,如果各位前輩認為還有更好方法也請指點一下小弟我,感激不盡!!!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

成功的人絕不半途而廢,半途而廢的人永不可能成功

衷心建议，楼主认真看看OG的解释，看看他是怎么看文章的基本结构的。尽量想ETS之所想，不要大而化之，不要满足于仅仅知道大概的结构分类。要在每段都概括一下的基础上得出文章的总体线索。

og6是新老观点对比型，也可以算现象解释型。

og7是现象解释型，也可以算评述某人文章型。

og8是现象解释型，也可以算新旧观点对比型。

但这样分类的意义不大了。还是好好看看解释，例如第40题的解释就很好很好。在看完文章后合上书，看看你自己是否也能够做出这样的总结。如果能，就非常好了。但一开始进行阅读时，我们往往做不到。

請問前輩這句話的意思是說,我們在作題時要盡量能紀錄像og般的文章框架嗎?不過og的解釋雖然精簡,我們在作題時真的能做出如此有力的文章框架嗎?如何練習呢?

請問前輩我要如何練習才能達到這樣的水準呢?

另外也想請教一下兩位前輩關於作筆記的意義,在作題時對文章作筆記對理解文章框架雖然有幫助,但是我卻常常苦於花太多時間想該紀錄什麼而耽誤了閱讀的速度,那如果我在作題時不紀錄文章框架,也就是不做這樣的練習,兩位前輩認為我是否也該在做完題目後去練習一下紀錄框架,但是這樣的方法在實際作題時又不會用到,那作筆記的意義又何在呢?

第二個問題是我們在訓練讀文章框架時應該做哪些練習或作哪些總結呢?

我想，确实需要做出像og的解释一样清晰的文章框架，练习中应该有意识地逐段进行归纳概括。

我在阅读时不做笔记。我主要靠把握文章线索来记忆，即清楚段意，清楚每句的起承转合作用。

我想我大概能理解前輩的意思了,其他的問題我想應該已經有人討論過了,我也不打擾前輩您的時間了,多謝您的細心指教小弟感激不盡!!!!!!!!!!

______________________________________________________________________

成功的人決不半途而廢,半途而廢的人永不可能成功

順道問一下OG的第六篇第35題

35. It can be inferred from the passage that the “easy conclusion” mentioned in line 53 is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) People who migrate from rural areas to large cities usually do so for economic reasons.

(B) Most people who leave rural areas to take jobs in cities return to rural areas as soon as it is financially possible for them to do so.

(C) People with rural backgrounds are less likely to succeed economically in cities than are those with urban backgrounds.

(D) Most people who were once skilled workers are not willing to work as unskilled workers.

(E) People who migrate from their birthplaces to other regions of country seldom undertake a second migration.

我能理解35題答案為什麼是E但是我想問為什麼A不行呢文章裡明明提到

This assumption has led to the conclusion that the migrants’ subse-

quent lack of economic mobility in the North is tied to

rural background, a background that implies unfamil-

iarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.

初步理解是雖然作者有提到這個ASSUMPTION,不過我們在做推論題時還是要找絃外之音

而不能選文章直接提到的內容,這樣的理解準不準確呢?可請前輩說明一下嗎?

C is the best answer. To answer this question, you must first identify the “easy conclusion” mentioned in lines 77-79, which ties Black migrants’ “subsequent economic problems in the North to their rural background.” This linkage of rural background to economic difficulty after migration to the North is first mentioned in lines 20-26. Here, the author points out that researchers have

assumed that Black migrants encountered economic difficulties in northern cities because they were from rural rather than urban backgrounds, and that rural backgrounds imply “unfamiliarity with urban living and a lack of industrial skills.” This choice provides an assumption about the relationship between rural backgrounds and economic difficulty that underlies this conclusion. It

states that people with rural backgrounds are more likely to have economic difficulty in urban areas than are people with urban backgrounds.