ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1491|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GMAT&LSAT CR (LSAT part)Test 2 SectionIV-12th

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-7-16 10:35:00 | 只看该作者

GMAT&LSAT CR (LSAT part)Test 2 SectionIV-12th

12.   “Though they soon will, patients should not have a legal right to see their medical records. As a doctor, I see two reasons for this. First, giving them access will be time-wasting because it will significantly reduce the amount of time that medical staff can spend on more important duties, by forcing them to retrieve and return files. Second, if my experience is anything to go by, no patients are going to ask for access to their records anyway.”

Which one of the following, if true, establishes that the doctor’s second reason does not cancel out the first?

(A) The new law will require that doctors, when seeing a patient in their office, must be ready to produce the patient’s records immediately, not just ready to retrieve them.

(B) The task of retrieving and returning files would fall to the lowest-paid member of a doctor’s office staff.

(C) Any patients who asked to see their medical records would also insist on having details they did not understand explained to them.

(D) The new law does not rule out that doctors may charge patients for extra expenses incurred specifically in order to comply with the new law.

(E) Some doctors have all allowing their patients access to their medical records, but those doctors’ patients took no advantage of this policy.

答案:A。这道题偶一点头绪都没有。。。恳请大牛牛耐心指教。。。

沙发
发表于 2009-7-17 01:18:00 | 只看该作者

请注意——

题目是问:什么原因使第二个理由不能取消第一个理由。而不是第二个理由为什么不能让新法律通过。

原文说了,第一个理由是将工作人员的时间浪费在retrieve上;第二个理由是,根本就没有病人要看病历。如果第二个理由成立,也就是说,没有人要看,也就没有必要去retrieve了。所以,从作者的角度出发,其逻辑是说,没人要就不需要准备。

如果要反驳这个逻辑,就要说,即使没人要,也得准备(produce)出来,而不是等病人要了,再去retrieve。这就是A选项正确的原因。

从这题看来,LSAT的逻辑和GMAT的逻辑还是有差别的。GMAT逻辑要求从整篇文章角度出发,对前提和结论都要予以关注。而LSAT则注重问题。问题问的可能不是整篇文章是否立得住脚,而是就文章中的前提之间的逻辑进行考核,更加细致了! 所以,用GAMT的解题思路很容易陷入误区。

因此,大家可以考虑不去练习LSAT或者不去练习类似出题思路的LSAT,以免影响GAMT思路。


[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/17 1:21:32编辑过]
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2009-7-17 10:59:00 | 只看该作者
真是聪明啊,呵呵!谢谢大牛牛提示!我会注意不让lsat对我产生负面影响的。会避开那些不同出题思路的题目的。呵呵。LSAT逻辑确实考的比GMAT要更细心些,个人感觉LSAT的逻辑难度要比GMAT要稍高出一点,出题思路有85%的相同性。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-17 06:35
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部