ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2637|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-5-19,大全-5-20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-17 17:41:00 | 只看该作者

大全-5-19,大全-5-20

19. Recent estimates predict that between 1982 and 1995 the greatest increase in the number of people employed will be in the category of low-paying service occupations. This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.
If the estimates above are accurate, which of the following conclusions can be drawn?
(A) In 1982 more people were working in low-paying service occupations than were working in high-paying service occupations.
(B) In 1995 more people will be working in high-paying service occupations than will be working in low-paying service occupations.
(C) Nonservice occupations will account for the same share of total employment in 1995 as in 1982.
(D) Many of the people who were working in low-paying service occupations in 1982 will be working in high-paying service occupations by 1995.
(E) The rate of growth for low-paying service occupations will be greater than the overall rate of employment growth between 1982 and 1995.
正确答案: A, 可是从原文中怎么也找不出low-paying和hign-paying的share的比较, 文中只是说前者不变, 而后者增长了.还是原文的意思我给弄错了? 请大家指教.
20. For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.
The statements above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Where public-service workers are permitted to strike, contract negotiations with those workers are typically settled without a strike.
(B) Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.
(C) Binding arbitration tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers where it is the only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.
(D) Most categories of public-sector workers have no counterparts in the private sector.
(E) A strike by workers in a local government is unlikely to be settled without help from an arbitrator.
答案:C. 这道题根本就没看懂. 哪位NN给翻译一下吧.谢谢!
沙发
发表于 2003-12-17 20:35:00 | 只看该作者
19是math题:
设82年low-paying的number为A, high-paying  B, 总worker的number X。
95年low-paying的增加数量K, high-paying增加 L, K>L 总worker的增加为M 。
82年low的share:   A/X             high的share : B/X
95年low的share: (A+K)/(X+M)       high的share:     (B+L)/(X+M)
分母同时增加相同的数,分子前者增加的比后者多,而前者的值没有增加,后者增加了,可以得出A>B.

20题也没看懂。
板凳
发表于 2003-12-18 12:41:00 | 只看该作者
19, God, can this be done within 1'40''??? I think it will take at least 3 minutes!
I was wrong at the first point. But later i understood. The process is as follows:

                                  1982     ------>>>>>                1995

Low-paying service         70,Greatest increase in NO.(say,30)   but share doen't increase

High-paying service         30, Lower increase in NO. (say, 20)   but share increase

(70+30)/(70+30+30+20)= 2/3 >7/10


20, 当地政府订其员工的所有罢工为违法将是一个严重错误,而必将付出沉重代价。因为所有劳工纠纷将有仲裁解决, 不会再有磋商的机会。相反,政府仅应该将那些不能替代的服务的公务员罢工定位违法。  C:通过仲裁解决纠纷对公务员更有力,因为没有其他手段来解决问题。(政府不让他们罢工,因为没人代替工作。另外,通过仲裁解决纠纷,政府将付出沉重代价,  所以对公务员更有力拉)
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-18 13:48:00 | 只看该作者
万分感谢两位的解答! 弄清楚之余, 觉得这两道题十分之奇怪: 19: ETS到底是在考逻辑还是数学啊? Ft! 20: 要有什么样的阅读水平才能应付这样的逻辑题啊!
5#
发表于 2005-4-20 22:48:00 | 只看该作者

其实20题不用这么解释出来的。

题目中:all disputes must  be settled by binding arbitration-----strikes should be outlawed only for public-sector workers

C 项: Binding arbitration (BA)tends to be more advantageous for public-service workers and BA only available means of settling labor disputes with such workers.

根据题目就可以直接找到答案了。注意: dispute =strikes 架桥

6#
发表于 2005-4-22 18:55:00 | 只看该作者

我很疑惑依据题目的意思可得知: 虽然binding arbitration对政府不利,但是因为public-sector worker的工作很重要,所以应该outlaw strikes for public-sector worker,也就是public-sector worker可获得binding arbitration。但是哪里可以推出答案C中的Binding arbitration is more advantageous for public-service worker以及it is the only available means 呢???

而答案B中”Where strikes by all categories of pubic-sector workers are outlawed, no acceptable substitutes for the services provided by any of those workers are available.”看请来像是题目的重述,为什么不对呢??请帮忙解惑一下,谢谢!!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 13:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部