ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1384|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

TWE182,请帮忙评下分吧

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-5 11:51:00 | 只看该作者

TWE182,请帮忙评下分吧

182. Many people have a close relationship with their pets. These people treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of their family. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.


Nowadays, many people have a close relationship with their pets. Some of them even treat their animals as members of their family. It seems to be a good phenomenon at first sight, however, a rational analysis of all facts would undoubtedly lead to the conclusion that such relationships are not good.


Firstly, animals, which are quite different from people, may feel uneasy when they are treated as mankind. Each kind of animals has their own habits, but they must obey the habits of the hosts when they have become so-called family members. Furthermore, because they are animals in itself, they cannot really express their feelings to people. For example, my aunt even teaches her dog to use the toilet, shake hands with guests, etc., but in the dog's eye, things may be not so nice as my aunt thinks and it has no choice but follow the instructions to get enough food. In a recent research, it is stated that many animals living in people's families have caught some serious mental disease.


The second reason that confirms my viewpoint is that people may be more lonely with their pets. In the modern society, the relationship between people has become so complex that many people distrust others in their daily lives. It is the very reason that now more people adopt pets in their families than ever before, they feel that only animals will keep loyal to them. They speak to animals, have dinner with animals, even sleep with animals, it is only animal that can make them feel warm. But in the long run, keeping doing so will do harm to those people as they will be too distracted from the real society. And it is not strange that a man has committed suicide just because his cat had died.


Admittedly, to some extent, animals can awake people of their natural love towards the world, but when all factors are taken into consideration the disadvantages of treating animals as family members far overweigh the advantages. On one hand, animals will be unhappy; on the other hand, people will be farther from the normal society and living style.


So, from all the reasons I have analyzed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that such relationships between people and animals are not good. There is no denying that we should love animals, however, undoubtedly not in this way.


还是卡时间写的,请评分提意见!~谢谢了~我下星期五就考了

沙发
发表于 2005-3-5 12:30:00 | 只看该作者
这道题不好写, 还是卡时间的, 观点都很不错,

Nowadays, many people have a close relationship with their pets. Some of them even treat their animals as members of their family(families). It seems to be a good phenomenon at the first sight, however, a rational analysis of all facts would undoubtedly lead to the conclusion that such relationships are not good.

Firstly, animals, which are quite different from people, may feel uneasy when they are treated as mankind. Each kind of(All) animals has(have) their own habits, but they must obey the habits(adjust to the habits) of the hosts when they have become so-called family members. Furthermore, because they are animals in itself(去掉), they cannot really express their feelings to people. For example, my aunt even teaches her dog to use the toilet, shake hands with guests, etc., but in the dog's eyes, things may be not so nice as my aunt thinks (may be different) and it has no choice but to follow the instructions to get enough food. In a recent research, it is stated that many animals living in people's families have caught some serious mental disease.

The second reason that confirms(supports) my viewpoint is that people may be more lonely with their pets. In the modern society, the relationship between people has become so complex that many people distrust others in their daily lives. It is the very reason that now more people adopt pets in their families than ever before, they feel that only animals will keep(remain) loyal to them. They speak to animals, have dinner(eat) with animals, even sleep with animals, it is only the animal that can make them feel warm. But in the long run, keeping doing so will do harm to those people as they will be too distracted from the real society. And it is not strange that a man has committed suicide just because his cat had died.

Admittedly, to some extent, animals can awake people of their natural love towards the world, but when all factors are taken into consideration, the disadvantages of treating animals as family members far overweigh the advantages. On one hand, animals will be unhappy; on the other hand, people will be farther from the normal society and living style.

So, from all the reasons I have analyzed above, we can safely draw the conclusion that such relationships between people and animals are not good. There is no denying that we should love animals, however, undoubtedly not in this way.

板凳
发表于 2005-3-5 14:09:00 | 只看该作者

182. Many people have a close relationship with their pets. Thesepeople treat their birds, cats, or other animals as members of theirfamily. In your opinion, are such relationships good? Why or why not?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Nowadays,many people have a close relationship with their pets. Some of themeven treat their animals as members of their family. It seems to be agood phenomenon at first sight, however, a rational analysis of allfacts would undoubtedly lead to the conclusion that such relationshipsare not good.

Firstly, animals, which arequite different from people, may feel uneasy when they are treated as mankind. Each kind of animals has their own habits, but they must obeythe habits of the hosts when they have become so-called family members.Furthermore, because they are animals in itself (themselves), they cannot reallyexpress their feelings to people. For example, my aunt even teaches herdog to use the toilet, shake hands with guests, etc., but in the dog'seye (eyes), things may be not so nice as (what) my aunt thinks and it has no choicebut follow (to follow好像是) the instructions to get enough food. In a recent research,it is stated that many animals living in people's families have caughtsome serious mental disease(diseases).

The secondreason that confirms my viewpoint is that people may be more lonelywith their pets. In the modern society, the relationship between peoplehas become so complex that many people distrust others in their dailylives. It is the very reason that now more people adopt pets in theirfamilies than ever before, they feel (两个句子间是不是要加连词?) that only animals will keep loyalto them. They speak to animals, have dinner with animals, even sleepwith animals, (同样,两个句子间要加连词吗?)it is only animal (animals)that can make them feel warm. But inthe long run, keeping doing so will do harm to those people as theywill be too distracted from the real society. And it is not strangethat a man has committed (committed) suicide just because his cat had died.

Admittedly,to some extent, animals can awake people of their natural love towardsthe world, but when all factors are taken into consideration thedisadvantages of treating animals as family members far overweigh theadvantages. On one hand, animals will be unhappy; on the other hand,people will be farther from the normal society and living style.

So,from all the reasons I have analyzed above, we can safely draw theconclusion that such relationships between people and animals are notgood. There is no denying that we should love animals, however,undoubtedly not in this way.

写得不错,我的水平有限,但我使劲挑也很难跳出什么毛病了。

,楼主考完事了一定不要忘了经验啊!预祝一切顺利!
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-6 02:16:00 | 只看该作者

because they are animals in itself(去掉),

白沙mm,我是想说,他们本质上还是动物,不知道该怎么表达,呵呵,不过如果去掉的话又觉得不够好。。。:( 迷惘ing

nuli dd,那两个句子间一定要用连词吗?我写的时候和读的时候还觉得满顺的,嘿嘿

谢谢你们啦,对了帮我看看我拿不准的一句:

on the other hand,people will be farther from the normal society and living style.

这样表达是可以的吗

5#
发表于 2005-3-6 12:27:00 | 只看该作者
我也是mm
我记得语法部分说两个句子间一定要加连词,你不记得了?
我也不知道这句话对不对, 我去问人了,可能要等几天有结果.
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-6 12:44:00 | 只看该作者

呵呵,sorry先

en,Tell me the result when you get it...^_^  Thanks~~~~

7#
发表于 2005-3-6 17:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用joanrain在2005-3-6 2:16:00的发言:

because they are animals in itself(去掉),


白沙mm,我是想说,他们本质上还是动物,不知道该怎么表达,呵呵,不过如果去掉的话又觉得不够好。。。:( 迷惘ing


because they are animals in nature.


nuli dd,那两个句子间一定要用连词吗?我写的时候和读的时候还觉得满顺的,嘿嘿    两个完整句之间可以不用,但一个完整句内的两个独立的主谓结构之间要有连词。         


谢谢你们啦,对了帮我看看我拿不准的一句:


on the other hand,people will be farther from the normal society and living style.  


这样表达是可以的吗  把father改成isolated 或者cut off 可以吗?



8#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-7 02:55:00 | 只看该作者
hehe,谢谢pengstone!~~bow一个
9#
发表于 2005-3-7 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
两个完整句之间可以不用,但一个完整句内的两个独立的主谓结构之间要有连词,
我以后注意一下看是不是这样,也谢谢了
10#
发表于 2005-3-7 14:21:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用nuli在2005-3-7 14:12:00的发言:
两个完整句之间可以不用,但一个完整句内的两个独立的主谓结构之间要有连词,
我以后注意一下看是不是这样,也谢谢了

谢谢,如发现反例请指出来, 一起讨论下。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

NTU MBA
MSGO
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-7 14:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部