ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1451|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-9702-22

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-4 23:50:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-9702-22

In casual conversation, people experience little psychological discomfort in admitting that they have some particular character flaw, but only if they consider trivial the flaw to which they admit. Therefore, if in a casual conversation an individual readily admits that he or she has some particular character flaw, the individual must not consider that flaw to be serious.



Which one of the following is an assumption necessary to the argument?



(A) Most character flaws are considered trivial by those who have them.


(B) People admit to having only those character flaws that most other people consider trivial.


(C) In casual conversation, people admit to having character flaws only when they must.


(D) In casual conversation, people admit to having a character flaw only when that admission causes them little psychological discomfort.


(E) In casual conversation, people do not speak of things that would give others an unfavorable impression of their character.



这道题作对了,但看真题祥解(官方解释)时却看不懂了,请高人帮我理理思路。


D. Correct. Suppose people sometimes readily admit to having a character flaw even when doing so causes them psychological discomfort (i.e., that [D] is false).


In that case, from the first sentence of the passage it follows that people sometimes readily admit even to character flaws they do not consider trivial.


That is, if (D) is false, then a person's admitting to a certain character flaw would not show that the person considered that flaw to be trivial; in short, the argument's conclusion would not follow. Thus (D) is the best answer.


黑体部分是这么结合文章的第一句推出来的呢?想不通呢!

沙发
发表于 2005-3-5 00:26:00 | 只看该作者
毕竟,人们可能承认自己有某些重大性格缺陷,但是这种承认却让本人很不爽(not little discomfort).
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-5 21:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用dphxmg在2005-3-5 0:26:00的发言:
毕竟,人们可能承认自己有某些重大性格缺陷,但是这种承认却让本人很不爽(not little discomfort).


好像你说的就是:Suppose people sometimes readily admit to having a character flaw even when doing so causes them psychological discomfort (i.e., that [D] is false).   


A:admit to having a character flaw-->psychological discomfort


people experience little psychological discomfort in admitting that they have some particular character flaw but only if they consider trivial the flaw to which they admit.


B:little psychological discomfort in admitting-->consider trivial


In that case, from the first sentence of the passage it follows that people sometimes readily admit even to character flaws they do not consider trivial


C:admit even to character flaws-----> do not consider trivial


A+B------>c    文中的推理是这样的吗?


可能比较愚钝,遇到元素稍微多的,逻辑关系不是很明确,我就反应迟钝!象这种题,该如何想?谢谢指点!




地板
发表于 2005-3-5 22:20:00 | 只看该作者

我的做法是:

1. 先找关键概念 (Statement 1: admitting flaw, little discomfort, trivial flaw. Statement 2: admitting flaw, non-serious (=trivial) flaw)

2. 搞清它们之间的关系

For example:

statement 1: (admitting-->little discomfort)-->trivial flaw (premise)

statement 2: admitting -->trivial flaw (conclusion)

answer d: admitting--> little discomfort (assumption. generally speaking, an assumption is an implicit premise.)

建议一边读一边做做笔记(列出关键概念及关系)。对常人来说,这样做比较容易发现logic leap。但是坏处是会浪费时间。最好的办法是想办法提高自己的短期记忆能力。这是也是我的弱项,(唉,没办法,谁让人上了岁数呢!)如果诸君有好办法的话,不要忘了告诉我呀。

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-5 23:33:00 | 只看该作者

你的分析很清晰!

就是要提高自己的短期记忆能力和敏锐分析能力,谢谢!

办法就是多练!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-17 18:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部