ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1637|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 阅读 7-10 请确认答案是否正确

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-2-12 23:43:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 阅读 7-10 请确认答案是否正确

According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was


              



  • innovative because it relied on newspaper advertisements as evidence


  • exceptional in that it concentrated on the period before the American Revolution


  • unusual in that it focused on educational attitudes rather than on educational practices


  • controversial in its claims regarding educational opportunities for boys


  • atypical in that it examined the education of girls

  • 答案是B,但我认为应是E。下面是原文


    Introduction of the republican moth-


           erhood thesis dramatically changed


           historiography.  Prior to Kerber’s work,


    educational historians barely mentioned


    women and girls; Thomas Woody’s 1929


    (25)      work is the notable exception.  Examining


    newspaper advertisements for acade-


    mies, Woody found that educational


    opportunities increased for both girls


    and boys around 1750.


    划线部分中用了“;”,说明其前后部分是并列关系,后面说明前面。


    且题干是according to ----- 说明答案可以从文中直接得出,不用推导,而B多少含有了推导的意味。


    我的想法,不知是否正确,请NN指教,谢谢!!


    沙发
    发表于 2005-3-11 16:07:00 | 只看该作者

    顶一下

    一开始我也选E,而且原因和楼主一样,后来看了前人的帖子,有点动摇,但是还没下决定,还请牛人指点

    According to the passage, within the field of educational history, Thomas Woody’s 1929 work was

    某牛人说,此题问的是在整个教育历史中,而我们看的划线部分在文中的意思是相对于Kerber前的研究而言的,二者所占的角度不一样。

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-5 07:50
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部