ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1959|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[逻辑小分队] PREP07-黑脸boldface题求讨论 no.20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-6-21 10:34:34 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
20.   (27836-!-item-!-188;#058&003666)
During the past year, Pro-TectInsurance Company's total payout on car-theft claims has been larger than thecompany can afford to sustain.  Pro-Tectcannot reduce the number of car-theft policies it carries, so it cannot protectitself against continued large payouts that way.  Therefore, Pro-Tect has decided to offer adiscount to holders of car-theft policies whose cars have antitheftdevices.  Many policyholders will respondto the discount by installing such devices, since the amount of the discountwill within two years typically more than cover the cost of installation.  Thus, because cars with antitheft devicesare rarely stolen, Pro-Tect's plan is likely to reduce its annual payouts.
In the argument above, the twoportions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first and the second areboth evidence offered by the argument as support for its main conclusion.
(B) The first presents a problem aresponse to which the argument assesses; the second is the judgment reached bythat assessment.
(C) The first is the position theargument seeks to establish; the second is a judgment the argument uses tosupport that position.
(D) The first is a development thatthe argument seeks to explain; the second is a prediction the argument makes insupport of the explanation it offers.
(E) The first presents adevelopment whose likely outcome is at issue in the argument; the second is ajudgment the argument uses in support of its conclusion about that outcome.



答案是B。我不太理解B这个选项究竟是什么意思。。有人可以翻译一下吗, 什么叫 presents a problem a response? 第一个BF本身不就是一个problem么?难道是Response?
ABE之间无法抉择啊。。。而且这篇文章的conclusion究竟是神马?求讨论!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-6-28 15:27:47 | 只看该作者
presnet X Y = present Y to X
因为Y后面接了从句 所以只好放在后面 不然引起阅读不方便

第二个黑体就是全文得出的结论
因此ABE中只能选B
板凳
发表于 2014-6-29 11:57:55 | 只看该作者
A response to which是定语从句你没理解结构
地板
发表于 2014-7-1 21:40:14 | 只看该作者
我正好在做BF,就贴一下我的思路吧,我习惯先把文章读清楚

PT公司的支出超过了可承受范围
BF1-PT不可能减少政策,所以它不能保护自己免受大额支出
所以,PT决定给政策的持有者折扣
很多人装了防盗设施,由于折扣可以覆盖成本
BF2-结果,因为装了防盗设施的车很少被偷,PT的计划可以减少支出


BF1,BF2都是观点,不是evidence,杀A
BF2就是conclusion,不是为了去support…,杀CDE
B-BF1是作者要去评价的观点,BF2是作者自己的观点,也就是文章的结论
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-30 04:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部