ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1839|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

525 考试 今天起每天一篇作文求批改!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-5-16 16:12:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: People can solve important problems by themselves or with the help from their family members so there's no need for the government to help them.
525 考前一月机经。
When it comes to the issue of people can solve important problems by themselves or the help from their family members so there is no need for the government to help them,I think we should get rid of the important by ourselves.
First and foremost,education inspires people to learn get rid of important problems by ourselves. Even in the kindergarten, teachers taught us to solves things independently. When we got into high school, we learnt the how to set a personal schedule for every week. It's crystal clear that the more education one received, the more independent one we will be.And more and more people become more independent,the government will have more available time to develop the national economic,culture and military.
Moreover,solving problems by oneselves become significant to one’s success and more people realize that in universities,students are always asked to finish projects by themlelves of with the help of family or team members.Thus young people are forced to be more independent and cooperative baceuse that his or her success is partially dendping on themselves and others’ performence. For instance,as a famous businessman,Mark Zuckerberg,he is faced with a important problems when he was in Havard University.He need to make a decision between Facebook and his student career.In the end, he gave up his professional learing career and established his own company.Marc solved important problems by himselves and he is improve his interpersonal skills.So we can enhance our social experience by solving problems by ourselves.

Finally, statistic data shows that if one solved most important by themleves, the government will have more free time and available money to help the people who is staving. In old days, because of communication problem, people can only solve important problems depend on themselves or ask help for nearby friedns.. Now, however, with the development of information technology, one can reach anybody around the world via Internet. That means that people can get help easier than the past, and, in turn, they will be more willing than ever to solve problems by themselves or ask help for family members.

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2014-5-16 17:22:09 | 只看该作者
TPO 21 综合写作
The reading passage analyzes the issue that through genetic modification,it is possible to create trees that produce more fruit,grow faster or withstand adverse conditions and bring a number of benefits.The professor's  lecture focuses on the same issue.However,she contends that genetic modification trees have some disadvantages.In the lecture,she uses the three specific points to support his idea.
First of all,even though the reading suggests that genetically modified trees are designed to be hardier than nature trees.The professor argues in the lecture that the genetically modified tree can not reisist the a changed climate.This is because the genetically modified tree are designed to resist specific environment.Obviously,the professor's argument disproves the genetically modified tree are designed to be hardier than nature trees.
Moreover,despite the statement in the reading that genetically modified trees promise to bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them,the professor contends that genetically modified trees have some side effect.Then she supports her idea with the fact that planting genetically modified tree cost a lot of money too.
Finally,the professor asserts that the overgrowth of genetically modified trees are harmful for wild trees whereas the reading claims that the use of genetically modified trees can prevent overreploitation of wild trees.The professor proves her idea that this claim  is indefensible by poing out that ——i.e,the overgrowth of genetically modified trees take too much space and prevent the growth of wild trees.In other words, the genetically modified trees caused damage to wild trees.
In conclusion,the professor clearly identified the weaknesses  in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading,——that is,through genetically modified trees  it is possible to bring a number of benefits is incorrect.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-8 11:03
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部