ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1937|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

小安阅读Passage 42有一题疑问

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-27 11:20:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
答案定位在此处:
In the fall of 1954, for example, C. Vann Woodward delivered a lecture series at the University of Virginia which challenged the prevailing dogma concerning the history, continuity, and uniformity of racial segregation in the South. He argued that the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries not only codified traditional practice but also were a determined effort to erase the considerable progress made by Black people during and after Reconstruction in the 1870’s.
2.        It can be inferred from the passage that the “prevailing dogma” (line 10) held that(A) Jim Crow laws were passed to give legal status to well-established discriminatory practices in the South(B) Jim Crow laws were passed to establish order and uniformity in the discriminatory practices of different southern states(C) Jim Crow laws were passed to erase the social gains that Black people had achieved since Reconstruction(D) the continuity of racial segregation in the South was disrupted by passage of Jim Crow laws(D)(E) the Jim Crow laws of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries were passed to reverse the effect of earlier Jim Crow laws
答案选D,我想请问C为什么不对?

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-8-27 15:00:27 | 只看该作者
我是这样理解的;

这里一开始就说了Vann woodard chanllenged the dogma .所以它的观点应该是和dogma相反,这一点从后边he argued that也可以看出来。
然后他的观点是jim crow laws 不但…而且……。,

对比D中           racial segregation was disrupted by   
原文Vann         traditional practice was codified by
traditional practice和racial segregation是相互对应,disrupted 和codified完全相反

而C中是Vann的看法,不是dogma的看法
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-27 15:10:45 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2013-8-27 15:00
我是这样理解的;

这里一开始就说了Vann woodard chanllenged the dogma .所以它的观点应该是和dogma相反 ...

谢谢楼主,不选C的原因我弄懂了,但是你解释的D选项还是有点疑问。codify是编撰的意思,disrupted
是打断,这两个不应该是同义词。
地板
发表于 2013-8-27 15:12:12 | 只看该作者
liwen0625 发表于 2013-8-27 15:10
谢谢楼主,不选C的原因我弄懂了,但是你解释的D选项还是有点疑问。codify是编撰的意思,disrupted
是打断 ...

一个是确立,一个是打破,
是反义词啊,我没说是同义词啊,反义词才对,因为Vaan和dogma的说法本来就相反
而且我怎么成了楼主啦
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-27 15:13:55 | 只看该作者
enkyklios 发表于 2013-8-27 15:12
一个是确立,一个是打破,
是反义词啊,我没说是同义词啊,反义词才对,因为Vaan和dogma的说法本来就相反 ...

哦 我懂了, 就是把Vann的取非就是dogma的看法,谢谢。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-5 05:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部