[求助]一道逻辑题

F：We ought not to test the safety of new drugs on sentient animals, such as dogs and rabbits. Our benefit means their pain, and they are equal to us in the capacity to feel pain.

G: We must carry out such tests; otherwise, we would irresponsibly sacrifice the human lives that could have been saved by the drugs.

Which of the following, if true, is the best objection that could be made from F's point of view to counter G's point?

(A) Even though it is not necessary for people to use cosmetics, cosmetics are also being tested on sentient animals.

(B) Medical science already has at its disposal a great number of drugs and other treatments for science illnesses.

(C) It is not possible to obtain scientifically adquate results by testing drugs in the tset tube without making tests on living tissue.

(D) Some of the drugs to be tested would save human beings from great pain.

(E) Many tests now performed on sentient animals can be performed equally well on fertilized chicken eggs that are at a very early stage of development.

答案是E，请问 A错在哪里。 原文要削弱G，G说我们应用动物试验 否则用药的人会死 。        A选项我认为可以理解成即使不做动物试验，人也不会死，因为有的试验无关紧要。 请教一下。

谢谢！