看到00分大牛tonyadidas的AA 模版
必要性理解无能
必要性攻击At firstplace, the author unfairly assumes that A determined solely by B. While B is aseemingly important element in determining A, it is hardly the only or evennecessarily required element. This assumption overlooks other crucial criteriain determining A—such as C, D, to list just a few. Accordingly, withoutaccounting for these potential factors, the author concludes too hastily thatthese prescriptions cited are the best means of achieving goals.
主要是不理解A determined solely by B 和 other crucial criteria in determining A
1.我的理解是:只有B——>A,然后C和D是驳斥它,说还有C,D也可能——>A( crucial criteria in determining A)。
【但是感觉这就说不通了,因为这是找他因,感觉是充分性的攻击啊?】
所以我想问是不是我对那个determine的理解是错误的。
2.感觉原来模版想要表达的意思是:A只能——>B,然后CD驳斥它,说A还可以推出其他结果即C或D,那“ other crucial criteria in determining A”我就完全理解反了。
所以求大牛们解释到底是哪个?因为如果没有搞明白的话到时候两种看法的C,D写出来就是完全不同的东西,怕到时候写错啊= =
22号就考试!!!在线等挺急的
附上充分性模版:
充分性攻击At secondplace, the author’s solution rests on the assumption that B is sufficient togive birth to the desired goals. However, if it turns out that A is due to acombination of factors, some of which will remain unchanged in the future, suchas C and D, mere B might have no stimulating impact on A.
这个不就是B——>A,驳斥它就是用C,D也能推出A,所以驳充分性呗...
那不是和我理解的那个必要性一样了啊?
所以怀疑是不是理解错了,是不是应该是第二个意思??
求大牛确认!!!!
|