ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1210|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 16套 22

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-9 10:05:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
   
Springfield FireCommissioner: the vast majority of false fire alarms are prank calls madeanonymously from fire alarm boxes on street corners. Sincevirtually everyone has access to a private telephone, these alarm boxeshave outlived their usefulness. Therefore, we propose to remove theboxes. Removing the boxes will reduce the number of prank callswithout hampering people’s ability to report a fire.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the claim that the proposal, if carriedout, will have the announced effect?

A.   !The fire department traces all alarm calls made from private telephones and records where they came from.

B.   Maintaining the fire alarm boxes costs Springfield approximately five million dollars annually.

C.   A telephone call can provide the fire department with more information about the nature and size of afire than can an alarm placed from an alarm box.

D.   Responding to false alarms significantly reduces the fire department’s capacity for responding to fires.

E.    Onany given day, a significant percentage of the public telephones in Springfield are out of service.

我觉得A和C都对。。 这里不选box是因为box 没用。而且可以被private phone 代替。。 要support 的话 应该说Box 到底有多无用 或者说private phone 为何可以取代。。。  box 的唯一优点就是因为能确定location吗?? 所以之所以phone 能取代就是因为也可以track location??? 那C说的无关?? 。。。我好像把自己说明白了- - 。。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-12-9 13:53:01 | 只看该作者
这里不是说box没用,是说box是有人恶作剧去乱打的。私人电话能降低恶作剧
板凳
发表于 2012-12-10 03:54:47 | 只看该作者
原文结论focus在两点上,一是减少谎报,二是不影响他们报警的能力。

显然C选项没有解决谎报的问题,因此没有A好。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-12 15:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部