- UID
- 809296
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2012-9-19
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
"This city should be able to improve existing services and provide new ones without periodically raising the taxes of the residents. Instead, the city should require that the costs of services be paid for by developers who seek approval for their large new building projects. After all, these projects can be highly profitable to the developers, but they can also raise a city's expenses and increase the demand for its services."
Discuss how well reasoned ... etc.
范文里只有两个错误
First, the fact that developers standto make profits from their projects is not a good reason to require themto pay more than their fair share of the costsof services. In fact, to require them to do this in order to win approval oftheir projects is tantamount to robbery. Cityofficials would find it difficult to justify a policy that endorsed this practice. Moreover, the adoption ofsuch a practice would discourage the development of new buildings in the city.
Second, the increase in demand for city services as well asthe increase in the city’s expenses will be most likely offset by the taxrevenues these projects generate. Consequently, unless the author candemonstrate that the city will incur expensesthat are not covered by the increased revenues from these projects, theauthor’s concern about these issues is unfounded.
第二个错误到底什么意思？
还有第三个错误吗？我想到的是“市民可能不一定有钱去消费，所以不会增加demand" |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2012-9-30 18:13:11
收藏
收藏
