ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1790|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[考古] 恐龙灭绝 (之前的考错了)

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-6-13 12:36:30 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
[tr][td=1007]说恐龙灭绝的,说传统观点认为650 million year ago 小行星撞地球引起了突然的mass extinction,当然包括恐龙。 有一个考古学家通过对很多动物的化石的研究发现 it is not as massive as传统观点,some animal exists before 650 million year(or after,具体我想不起来了,在此有一道判断题,全部围绕着那种动物存在 before or after 650 million year,一定要仔细) ,特别讲有一种对于环境变化很脆弱的frog。同时有好些动物被证实 650 million 前后都存在,其他的大家看以前的详细几经吧。[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本2[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]一个人说在65亿(忘记了)地球发生一次大灾难然后动物大规模灭绝,b跳出来说其实不是,出来一种恐龙,其他的都是在之前活着,还有什么一种海洋的东西在那个大灾难发生前就有90%灭绝了。估计不知这个引起的。[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本3[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]有一篇是说传统观点认为小行星撞地球引起了n年前突然的mass extinction。但是考古发现,除了恐龙外很多动物的化石在较晚一点的cites被发现,其中有一种对于环境变化很脆弱的frog。同时有好些动物 证实在预计发生小行星碰撞之前就绝种了,所以新结论认为mass extinction不是突然发生的,而是慢慢有一个过程,(有题问新老观点的不同之处,答案很绕,每个都象,需要仔细辨别)最后一段说到一种鱼(好象是 鱼,记不清了),这个鱼受什么影响减少,而它是恐龙的主要粮食。[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本4[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]传统观点认为小行星撞地球引起了n年前突然的mass extinction。小行星的碰撞引起了大量的dust, 还有climate的温度变化, 所以导致mass extinction. 但考古学家发现 这个extinction不是as massive as we think. 因为除了(nonfly dinosaur), 很多动物的化石在较晚一点的cites被发现. {注: nonfly dinosaur有考点, 问nonfly dinosaur到底怎么样了. 答: nonfly dinosaur在65亿年前就extinct了}. 另外提到一种frog, 对于climate变化的反应很脆弱, 但连它都能存活下来....
后来又发现证据:说是在灭绝以前,海洋就不断向周边的陆地侵蚀incursion,造成了许多植物的死亡,而这些是恐龙的主要食物。
总的来说题目不难, 这篇在第3题出现,
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本5[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]第一段,LATE XX 纪 一种M恐龙的化石使得人们长期认为这种恐龙的出现和一些生物的灭绝是同期的。近期的研究让科学家的兴趣从研究恐龙的灭绝转向研究这种恐龙出现的年代的 surroundingevents。第二段,新研究发现,这种M恐龙的出现predate生物的灭绝。第三段,有人说那些生物灭绝是因为天气,比如天气曾经很干燥。 但是这些生物的灭绝在天气很干燥之前还是之后,并且有些生物生活在更干燥的环境下,并且好后来才灭绝第四段,有人说是慧星撞击魁北克省,还留了个坑呢!但 是,当时只有几种动物灭绝,大规模的脊椎动物灭绝不是这个时候。(前面提到的动物好像是甲壳动物和另一种什么动物,这里第一次提到脊椎动物)末段,原因是 多方面的,要综合考虑。[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本6[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]说恐龙灭绝的,说传统观点认为650 million year ago 小行星撞地球引起了突然的mass extinction,当然包括恐龙。 有一个考古学家通过对很多动物的化石的研究发现 it is not as massive as传统观点,some animal exists before 650 million year(or after,具体我想不起来了,在此有一道判断题,全部围绕着那种动物存在 before or after 650 million year,一定要仔细) ,特别讲有一种对于环境变化很脆弱的frog。同时有好些动物被证实 650 million 前后都存在,其他的大家看以前的详细几经吧。
一个人说在65亿(忘记了)地球发生一次大灾难然后动物大规模灭绝,b跳出来说其实不是,出来一种恐龙,其他的都是在之前活着,还有什么一种海洋的东西在那个大灾难发生前就有90%灭绝了。估计不是这个引起的。
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本7[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]有一篇是说传统观点认为小行星撞地球引起了n年前突然的mass extinction。但是考古发现,除了恐龙外很多动物的化石在较晚一点的cites被发现,其中有一种对于环境变化很脆弱的frog。同时有好些动物 证实在预计发生小行星碰撞之前就绝种了,所以新结论认为mass extinction不是突然发生的,而是慢慢有一个过程,(有题问新老观点的不同之处,答案很绕,每个都像,需要仔细辨别)最后一段说到一种鱼(好像是 鱼,记不清了),这个鱼受什么影响减少,而它是恐龙的主要粮食。
补充: 传统观点认为小行星撞地球引起了n年前突然的mass extinction。小行星的碰撞引起了(1)大量的dust, 还有(2)climate的温度变化, 所以导致mass extinction. 但考古学家发现这个extinction不是as massive as we think. 因为除了(nonfly dinosaur), 很多动物的化石在较晚一点的cites被发现. {注: nonfly dinosaur有考点, 问nonfly dinosaur到底怎么样了. 答: nonfly dinosaur在65亿年前就extinct了}. 另外提到一种frog, 对于climate变化的反应很脆弱, 但连它都能存活下来....
后来又发现证据:说是在灭绝以前,海洋就不断向周边的陆地侵蚀incursion,造成了许多植物的死亡,而这些是恐龙的主要食物。
[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]版本8[/td][/tr][tr][td=1007]是恐龙灭绝的原因不是气候,作者举了腭鱼的例子,如果是气候变化,那腭鱼就不会能存活了。然后分析而是一次的发碰撞引起DUST杀死了陆地植物先
分 析恐龙灭绝原因的,讲传统观点是一个叫做Catastrophe的 学派,认为灭绝是由小行星撞地球引起的,并认为是由于撞击导致天气剧变,从而。。。但后来对化石的分析证明上诉观点不成立,因为很多对天气变化非常敏感的 动物并没有灭绝。后面一段则讲这一新发现并不能说明小行星撞地球这一观点不成立,因为根据新发现,有可能是植物死亡导致食草地物,which are prey of dinosaur,死亡,而植物死亡的原因有可能有两个,其中一个就是小行星撞地球导致粉尘(dust)什么的。
题目:
Q1:有一题是同意替换:原文是M恐龙出现predate甲壳动物extinction,选项是甲壳动物extinction postdate M恐龙出现。
Q2:过去科学家研究兴趣集中在恐龙灭绝的时候,后来转移到了恐龙出现的时候了
Q3:有题问新老观点的不同之处
Q4:{注: nonfly dinosaur有考点, 问nonfly dinosaur到底怎么样了. 答: nonfly dinosaur在65亿年前就extinct了}
在此有一道判断题,全部围绕着那种动物存在 before or after 650 million year,一定要仔细)
[/td][/tr]
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-6-13 12:56:13 | 只看该作者
顶起
板凳
发表于 2012-6-13 13:29:36 | 只看该作者
小猴子太给力了!!!
地板
发表于 2012-6-13 23:24:37 | 只看该作者
汗,之前考错的那个是什么啊??
5#
发表于 2012-6-25 21:08:43 | 只看该作者
顶,upup!
6#
发表于 2012-6-25 21:19:13 | 只看该作者
我也想知道,之前错的那个考成什么了/?
7#
发表于 2012-6-25 21:50:27 | 只看该作者
我还把你之前那个看了几遍呢。。。。这个来不及看了。。。算了,没事
8#
发表于 2012-6-25 21:50:52 | 只看该作者
之前是这个吧,回答楼上
12. 陨石撞击与恐龙灭绝Meteorite Impact and Dinosaur Extinction
There is increasing evidence that the impacts of meteorites have had important effects on Earth, particularly in the field of biological evolution. Such impacts continue to pose a natural hazard to life on Earth. Twice in the twentieth century, large meteorite objects are known to have collided with Earth.
If an impact is large enough, it can disturb the environment of the entire Earth and cause an ecological catastrophe. The best-documented such impact took place 65 million years ago at the end of the Cretaceous period of geological history. This break in Earth's history is marked by a mass extinction, when as many as half the species on the planet became extinct. While there are a dozen or more mass extinctions in the geological record, the Cretaceous mass extinction has always intrigued paleontologists because it marks the end of the age of the dinosaurs. For tens of millions of years, those great creatures had flourished. Then, suddenly, they disappeared.
The body that impacted Earth at the end of the Cretaceous period was a meteorite with a mass of more than a trillion tons and a diameter of at least 10 kilometers. Scientists first identified this impact in 1980 from the worldwide layer of sediment deposited from the dust cloud that enveloped the planet after the impact. This sediment layer is enriched in the rare metal iridium and other elements that are relatively abundant in a meteorite but very rare in the crust of Earth. Even diluted by the terrestrial material excavated from the crater, this component of meteorites is easily identified. By 1990 geologists had located the impact site itself in the Yucat region of Mexico. The crater, now deeply buried in sediment, was originally about 200 kilometers in diameter.
This impact released an enormous amount of energy, excavating a crater about twice as large as the lunar crater Tycho. The explosion lifted about 100 trillion tons of dust into the atmosphere, as can be determined by measuring the thickness of the sediment layer formed when this dust settled to the surface. Such a quantity of material would have blocked the sunlight completely from reaching the surface, plunging Earth into a period of cold and darkness that lasted at least several months. The explosion is also calculated to have produced vast quantities of nitric acid and melted rock that sprayed out over much of Earth, starting widespread fires that must have consumed most terrestrial forests and grassland. Presumably, those environmental disasters could have been responsible for the mass extinction, including the death of the dinosaurs.
Several other mass extinctions in the geological record have been tentatively identified with large impacts, but none is so dramatic as the Cretaceous event. But even without such specific documentation, it is clear that impacts of this size do occur and that their results can be catastrophic. What is a catastrophe for one group of living things, however, may create opportunities for another group. Following each mass extinction, there is a sudden evolutionary burst as new species develop to fill the ecological niches opened by the event.
Impacts by meteorites represent one mechanism that could cause global catastrophes and seriously influence the evolution of life all over the planet. According to some estimates, the majority of all extinctions of species may be due to such impacts. Such a perspective fundamentally changes our view of biological evolution. The standard criterion for the survival of a species is its success in competing with other species and adapting to slowly changing environments. Yet an equally important criterion is the ability of a species to survive random global ecological catastrophes due to impacts.
Earth is a target in a cosmic shooting gallery, subject to random violent events that were unsuspected a few decades ago. In 1991 the United States Congress asked NASA to investigate the hazard posed today by large impacts on Earth. The group conducting the study concluded from a detailed analysis that impacts from meteorites can indeed be hazardous. Although there is always some risk that a large impact could occur, careful study shows that this risk is quite small.
9#
发表于 2012-6-25 21:55:19 | 只看该作者
话说楼主你很  可爱,在final中还抽出时间为我们六月党考古
敬礼
10#
发表于 2012-6-27 16:26:10 | 只看该作者
这篇JJ里和7合并了
但是JJ 7里没有说到陨石什么的啊
到底是不是同一篇啊
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-30 00:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部