ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1588|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教OG-30题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-29 18:27:00 | 只看该作者

请教OG-30题

30. The price the government pays for standard weapons purchased from military contractors is determined by a
pricing method called “historical costing.” Historical costing allows contractors to protect their profits by adding a
percentage increase, based on the current rate of inflation, to the previous year’s contractual price.
Which of the following statements, if true, is the best basis for a criticism of historical costing as an economically
sound pricing method for military contracts?
A. The government might continue to pay for past inefficient use of funds.
B. The rate of inflation has varied considerably over the past twenty years.
C. The contractual price will be greatly affected by the cost of materials used for the products.
D. Many taxpayers question the amount of money the government spends on military contracts.
E. The pricing method based on historical costing might not encourage the development of innovative
weapons.


不理解答案为什么选A,请大家多多指教。谢谢!


沙发
发表于 2004-9-29 18:42:00 | 只看该作者
我去年 花高价买来的东东,但却不实用、且坏得快等,今年虽然我还得买那东东,但要我还像去年那样 高消费,肯定不当冤大头
板凳
发表于 2004-10-3 14:26:00 | 只看该作者
呵呵,这个比喻很贴切。
地板
发表于 2004-10-4 12:12:00 | 只看该作者

A 如果第一年定价过高,那么以后这种屋企的价格就不经济

B 通胀变就变,反正都是价格的组成部分,有什么关系?

C 同上理

D 纳税人问就问了,排除

E 人家问经济性,来个创新科技干什么?

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-17 16:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部