ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2116|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

lsat-18-4-17

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-8-25 06:50:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-18-4-17

17. The recent dramatic increase in commuter airline crashes is caused in large part by pilot inexperience. As a major growth industry, the commuter airlines have recently had a great increase in the demand for experienced pilots. It is impossible to define and assess pilot experience, however. For example, someone with 1000 hours of flight experience as an instructor in Arizona, where the weather is good, cannot be compared to someone with 1000 hours' experience as a night cargo pilot in the stormy northeastern United States.


The author's conclusion that the dramatic increase in commuter airline crashes is caused by pilot inexperience is most weakened by the fact that the author has


(A) argued that it is impossible to measure "pilot experience"


(B) used an example that does not relate logically to the point being illustrated


(C) provided only a partial explanation for the increase in commuter airline crashes


(D) made an unfair comparison between experience as a flight instructor and experience as a night cargo pilot


(E) not specified how much of the recent increase in commuter airline crashes is due to pilot inexperience


why B is incorrect


沙发
发表于 2004-8-26 05:27:00 | 只看该作者

1。原文用不同地方,不同条件的1000H飞行经验不同的例子说明不可能评价飞行经验,例子和结论是relate logically 。故B错

2。原文问题很绕,实质是原文用何方法WEAKEN原文结论。原文说因为难界定飞行经验,故结论飞行事故由没经验引起的说法受到怀疑。即A

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-8-26 21:52:00 | 只看该作者

lsat-18-4-17

however 理解错了,以为是例子和前面观点的转折,郁闷
地板
发表于 2019-8-4 17:22:45 | 只看该作者
ztlbox 发表于 2004-8-25 06:50
17. The recent dramatic increase in commuter airline crashes is caused in large part by pilot inexpe ...

Spot the question type: Method of reasoning - weaken.

Argument structure:

Citing an example to support a sub-conclusion as to conclude a claim.

However, Sub- C, it is impossible to define and assess pilot experiences, does not mean that commuter airlines does not have experienced pilot even it have had a great increase in the demand of experienced pilots.

* You need money does not mean you do not have money " Perhaps you just need more.

B. It does relate logically to the point being illustrated. ( The point of " it is impossible to define and assess pilot experiences )

C. It does not provide any explanation

D. it is not unfair. It is reasonable.

E. It could strengthen the argument; however, without it does not weaken the argument. So, without citing the recent increases does not necessary " not be able " to prove the point must be true.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-23 08:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部