- UID
- 579779
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-11-3
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
The problem with C) is that it is not necessary. Even if the recyclable portion shinks this year vs. last year, if the total amount of refuse shinks at a larger rate, then the plan still works.
It is a necessary assumption question. Use negation method to find the correct answer choice.
City service will separte enough refuse for recycling purposes in order to reduce the total number of truckloads of refuse sent for inceineration by half. The intent is to convert at least half of the refuse for recycling in order to cut the total amount for incineration/burning in a year.
If you read carefully, you would notice a scope shift from "the amount of residual ash" to "the number of truck loads." For the conclusion to hold, D has to be true, since it connects "amount of ash" to "truckload." What if this year's truck increases its capacity to twice as much as last year? Then the city will end up with equal amount of ash in the end. |
|