【在线等】一题求解~

catherinesjy · 发表于 2012-1-26 18:17:47

Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages. Last year, however, one candidate produced a half-hour-long advertisement. At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned in to that station. Clearly, then, many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

A. The candidate who produced the half-hour-long advertisement did not win election at the polls.
B. The half-hour-long advertisement was widely publicized before it was broadcast.
C. The half-hour-long advertisement was aired during a time slot normally taken by one of the most popular prime-time shows.
D. Most short political advertisements are aired during a wide range of programs in order to reach a broad spectrum of viewers.
E. In general a regular-length television program that features debate about current political issues depends for its appeal on the personal qualities of the program's moderator.

C。

求选出正确答案的兄弟姐妹们告诉弱弱的我怎么选出来的吧~ 把自己想法说出来就好~~ 我选成B了。。

sdcar2010 · 发表于 2012-1-26 22:24:59

Premise: people tuned into the advertisement.

Conclusion: people watched the advertisement.

Assumption, those who tuned into the advertisement did not tune "out."

Necessary assumption, use negation method to find the correct answer. Try it.

fox0923 · 发表于 2012-1-26 22:27:29

B选项不是against premise吗？原文说Because it was long thought that few people would watch lengthy televised political messages, most televised political advertisements, like commercial advertisements, took the form of short messages.然后后面说however，这个half hour politic program竟然可以吸引住人们看完整整30mins的节目。
如果是这样的话，即便half hour program在没有播放之前是widely publicized，也没用，因为人们还是不喜欢长时间的program。如此的话，肯定是有其他原因把人们吸引住了。

justabeginning · 发表于 2012-1-27 16:11:17

所有的CR题目的正确选项都要解释原文的现象或达到问题的目的，你的那道题中‘目的’为质疑‘many more people are interested in lengthy televised political messages than was previously thought’正确性，很明显你的B选项达不到‘目的’。或许经过你自己的一两个假设之后可以使B也达到目的但是那已经经过你的假设了i.e.没有正确选项直接

然而，CR有些难题中正确答案也需要一定的假设才能达到‘目的’，但是有一条是毋庸置疑的，那就是正确答案是所有答案中‘假设量’最小的选项

wtx2490467 · 发表于 2012-1-28 23:12:09

先给你翻译一下,
原来的人们觉得人们不喜欢长的政治广告,所以一般都放短的广告,
可是,去年有人放了一段半小时的,在一开始,很多人都转到这个台来了.
结论:所以人们还是喜欢看长的政治广告,

你发现没有,这里论据有问题,一开始人多跑过来看,不一定代表人们就喜欢看,所以这个可以作为预判的点,
WEAKEN 和增强题一定要紧抓CONCLUSION,
A. 赢不赢无关,CONCLUSION在于人们喜不喜欢看长广告,
B. 我觉得有一定削弱,属于它因削弱,
C. 正解,正好吻合了咱们之前的预判点,
D. SHORT 的目的无关,CONCLUSION在于观众是否爱看长广告
E. 这个无关,

所有题不一定只有一个削弱,一定要找削弱最直接的,

欢迎讨论指导,

gzhsdkd · 发表于 2012-10-4 21:13:39

At the beginning of the half-hour slot a substantial portion of the viewing public had tuned in to that station.
如果是在播出前做了大量的宣传，那么a substantial portion of the viewing public按理说应该在播出前就应该转到这个频道，而不是在刚开始才转到这个频道，这也符合大家想看喜欢的电视节目的习惯吧；而在开始后才“转到”这个频道，那就说明有可能只是想看这个频道的其他节目，不小心观看了这个广告。

780一次过 · 发表于 2017-11-6 12:25:19

wtx2490467 发表于 2012-1-28 23:12
先给你翻译一下,原来的人们觉得人们不喜欢长的政治广告,所以一般都放短的广告,可是,去年有人放了一段半小时 ...

所有题不一定只有一个削弱,一定要找削弱最直接的
其实B、C选项都属于其他原因的削弱
B选项的他因削弱在于由于：大力宣传了→人们收看
D选项的他因削弱在于由于：人们是想看原来这个时间段的节目→人们收看
D选项更直接指出收看原因在于想看这个台原来的节目，刚好与题干at beginning of the half-hour的暗示对应
B选项只是不太直接，没有D选项好

RichardVeritas · 发表于 2017-11-10 10:15:44

要看到讨论事物逻辑范畴的变化。
这里可以看到有几点：
这个候选人不代表所有候选人或通用情况，（what if 这个候选人有什么特殊吸引观众呢？）
在开头看这个节目不代表观众看了这么长时间，（what if 大家看了2秒都跑了？）

答案C针对第二个漏洞。指出观众是错调到那个台，原以为是看一个精彩电视剧。

Richard 770 逻辑答题讨论
https://forum.chasedream.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1303467&fromuid=1294035

本贴相关题目 GMATPrep-2008E2-CR-93 (EOSP)

相关帖子

更多相关帖子

【在线等】一题求解~

本帖子中包含更多资源

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()