ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1752|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

2题PREP,看不懂解释!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-20 10:48:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Gortland has long been narrowly self-sufficient inboth grain and meat. However, as per capita income in Gortland has risen towardthe world average, per capita consumption of meat has also risen toward theworld average, and it takes several pounds of grain to produce one pound ofmeat.  Therefore, since per capita incomecontinues to rise, whereas domestic grain production will not increase,Gortland will soon have to import either grain or meat or both.


Which of the following is an assumption on whichthe argument depends?

(A) The total acreage devoted to grain productionin Gortland will soon decrease.

(B) Importing either grain or meat will not resultin a significantly higher percentage of Gortlanders' incomes being spent onfood than is currently the case.

(C) The per capita consumption of meat in Gortlandis increasing at roughly the same rate across all income levels.

(D) The per capita income of meat producers inGortland is rising faster than the per capita income of grain producers.

(E) People in Gortland who increase theirconsumption of meat will not radically decrease their consumption of grain.

答案选E,但是我选了B。我觉得看了论坛上下载的解释,还是看不懂啊!







PREP20:
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings inPalitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to thecity.  There has been little parkingspace, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, andidling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tourbuses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminishsignificantly.




Which of the following, if true, most stronglysupports the argument?



(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles isnot a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.



(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are notthreatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.



(C) Tour buses typically spend less thanone-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from onesite to another.



(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour busthan by any other single means of transportation.



(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to findparking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.



答案是C,我选的是B。看了解释还是不能领悟!求高人相助!

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-12-20 19:27:12 | 只看该作者
吃肉也吃素 吃肉增加得出吃素要进口
what if 吃素锐减 减少掉的吃素部分可以抵消吃肉的增长? 这种情况下, 就不需要进口素食.
assumption其实是问推理成立的必要条件 (可以用取非验证法,如果assumption不成立,那么结论不成立)

E 吃素不会锐减 这是结论成立的必要条件

补充一点,正因为assumption这种取非导致结论为非的特性, 很多正确的选项都是否定形式的。

prep20
注意一句很重要的话 and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.

结论说 so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly。

如果idle的部分占总时间的很小比例,比如说只有5%, 那么结论diminish significantly那就不能成立。

C说 idle的时间占总时间的3/4还要多 所以 支持结论

B看起来有点象排除他因,但从上述分析可以看出B无法支持
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-21 02:38:18 | 只看该作者
谢谢Harris!
你的解释很管用啊!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-21 17:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部