剧急求讲一道逻辑题

08060328 · 发表于 2011-12-16 09:54:12

Sparva, unlike Treland’s other provinces, requires automobile insurers to pay for any
medical treatment sought by someone who has been involved in an accident; in the
other provinces, insurers pay for nonemergency treatment only if they preapprove the
treatment. Clearly, Sparva’s less restrictive policy must be the explanation for the fact
that altogether insurers there pay for far more treatments after accidents than insurers
in other provinces, even though Sparva does not have the largest population.
Description
The passage tells us that in Sparva automobile insurers pay for far more medical treatments
after accidents than they do in Treland’s other provinces. The passage concludes
that the explanation is to be found in the difference in legal requirements for insurers
in Sparva as compared to other provinces.
7. Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A Car insurance costs more in Sparva than in any other province.
B The cost of medical care in Sparva is higher than the national average.
C Different insurance companies have different standards for determining
what constitutes emergency treatment.
D Fewer insurance companies operate in Sparva than in any other province.
E There are fewer traffic accidents annually in Sparva than in any of the
provinces of comparable or greater population.

Explanation
The question asks you to identify among the answer choices a fact that would support
the passage’s argument. The explanation offered in the passage can be supported by ruling
out other explanations that might, given the information presented in the passage,
appear likely. One obvious explanation for there being more medical treatments in
Sparva is that there are more accidents there. Choice E rules out that explanation. So
Choice E strengthens the argument in the passage and is the correct answer. Choices A
and D each present consequences that are likely results of insurers in Sparva having to
pay for more medical treatments. But neither bears on the cause of insurers having to
pay for more treatments. Choice B does not strengthen the argument and may weaken
it. A higher cost of medical care provides additional motivation for people to seek insurance
payments to cover whatever post-accident care they receive. So Choice B might
weaken the argument by providing an alternative explanation for insurers paying for
more medical treatments in Sparva. According to the passage, whether treatment is
emergency treatment is, in other provinces, an important criterion in determining insurers’
responsibility. But since this criterion does not apply in Sparva, Choice C is not
directly relevant to the point that the passage is trying to establish.

看不懂啊~~崩溃啦

08060328 · 发表于 2011-12-16 10:07:37

自己顶

08060328 · 发表于 2011-12-16 11:06:59

有没有人讲一下？

thickhead · 发表于 2011-12-16 12:26:34

翻译了一下, 看看有没有用

S省与其他省不同, 车险公司要支付事故者的所有医疗费用. 在他省, 对于非急诊费用, 车险公司只支付其预先同意的部分. 所以S的这种宽松政策造成了该地车险公司比其他省公司在事故后支付更多医疗费用, 就算S省人口并不是最多.

Description

文章说S省车险公司比其他省公司在事故后支付更多医疗费用. 文章作出结论说这是因为S省和其他省在法律要求上的不同造成的.

7 哪一项可以加强.
A S省的车险比其他省贵.
B S省的医疗费比国家平均水平高.
C 不同的保险公司对急诊的定义不同
D S省比其他省的保险公司数量少
E与其他人口数量相当或更多的省相比,S省的年事故量少

Explanation

问题要求在答案中找支持文章论点的说法. 如果排除掉文章中所给信息的其他可能性解释(指要排除掉可以造成S省支付更多事故医疗费的解释), 就能支持文章中的解释(指是因为法律要求不同造成了S省医疗费更多). S省的医疗费更贵的一个明显解释是事故更多. E排除了这种解释, 所以E加强了文章的论点, 是正确答案.
A和D给出的现象都可能造成S省的保险公司支付更多医疗费, 但他们都没有指出保险公司支付医疗费的原因是什么. (这是说A和D没有提到哪种情况保险公司要付钱,所以就算保险费更贵, 也可能在事故方面覆盖范围小, 事故后支付的钱也不一定多.)
选项B没有加强论点,倒可能会削弱他.医疗费贵可能促使人们买保险来覆盖其在事故后需要的一切医治. B选项提供了S省保险公司支付更多医疗费的另一种解释, 所以削弱了文章中的解释.
根据文章, 是否急诊在其他省是确定保险公司责任的重要依据, 既然这个依据在S省不适用, C与文章需要确定的论点没有直接关系.

(这个题中, S省事故赔偿金更多是个已知现象, 造成这个现象的原因, 文章认为是政策方面. 要找支持, 就是要把其他可能造成保险费贵的原因去掉. E说S省事故少. 因为如果S省事故多, 那么事故赔偿金多就很正常了, 不一定是政策差异造成的.)

08060328 · 发表于 2011-12-16 12:46:50

谢谢牛牛

剧急求讲一道逻辑题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

剧急 求讲一道逻辑题

所属分类: GMAT考试

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块

剧急求讲一道逻辑题