ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2358|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

manhattan模考的一道逻辑题,求助~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-3 15:54:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Doctor: Research shows that adolescents who play video games on a regular basis are three times as likely to develop carpal tunnel syndrome as are adolescents who do not play video games. Federal legislation that prohibits the sale of video games to minors would help curb this painful wrist condition among adolescents.

The doctor’s conclusion depends on which of the following assumptions?

A    The majority of federal legislators would vote for a bill that prohibits the sale of video games to minors.

B    Not all adolescents who play video games on a regular basis suffer from carpal tunnel syndrome.

C    laying video games is the only way an adolescent can develop carpal tunnel syndrome.

D    Most parents would refuse to purchase video games for their adolescent children.

E    The regular playing of video games by adolescents does not produce such beneficial effects as better hand-eye coordination and improved reaction time.
我选的是C,答案选的是D~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-3 16:03:50 | 只看该作者
好像发错了板块~
板凳
发表于 2011-12-5 10:19:17 | 只看该作者
Necessary assumption. Use negation.

If you negate D), you have:
Most parents would NOT refuse to purchase video games for their adolescent children.
If so, the ban on teenagers from buying the game would have little effect on the actual sale since their parents would be the legitimate buy of the game for their beloved children. Then the conclusion of the passage would fall apart. D) is the necessary assumption for the argument.

C) on the other hand is too restrictive (the only way). Most restrictive statement would not be the right answer for a necessary assumption question. Plus, if you negate C), the argument still holds.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-27 19:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部