- UID
- 396592
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2008-11-13
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
the principal objection here is that the meaning is incorrect/unclear: for instance, a 'two-year low level' could mean that it hit a low level and then stayed there for two years.
consider other uses of the adjective "two-year": a two-year lease is a lease that LASTS for two years. a two-year recession is a recession that LASTS for two years. a two-year marriage ... etc. etc. by analogy, we can see that this answer choice has (or at least primarily suggests) the incorrect meaning: a two-year low level would be a low level that lasted for two years. that's not the intended meaning in the problem. |
|