ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1689|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP2-58求解!!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-29 18:16:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
58.   (33711-!-item-!-188;#058&007588)


The proposal to hire ten new police officers in Middletown

is quitefoolish.  There is sufficient funding topay the salaries of the new officers, but not the salaries of additional courtand prison employees to process the increased caseload of arrests(拘捕,逮捕)and convictions(指控,判罪) that new officers usually generate.

Which of the following, if true, will mostseriously weaken the conclusion drawn above?
(A) Studies have shown that an increase in acity's police force does not necessarily reduce crime.

(B) When one major city increased its police forceby 19 percent last year, there were 40 percent more arrests and 13 percent moreconvictions.

(C) If funding for the new police officers'salaries is approved, support for other city services will have to be reducedduring the next fiscal year.

(D) In most United States

cities, not allarrests result in convictions, and not all convictions result in prison terms.
(E) Middletown's ratio of police officers tocitizens has reached a level at which an increase in the number of officerswill have a deterrent(威吓,制止) effect on crime.



为什么A不对?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-30 09:58:33 | 只看该作者
conclusion. concession, premise.
I think there is long way between "crime" and "additional courtand prison employees"
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-30 16:46:06 | 只看该作者
还是不明白!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-27 15:44
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部