ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2110|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 78题的答案不是很明白,求解释

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-6-29 16:31:22 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
78. A recent report determined that although only 3 percent of drivers on Maryland highways equipped their vehicles with radar detectors, 33 percent of all vehicles ticketed for exceeding the speed limit were equipped with them. Clearly, drivers who equip their vehicles with radar detectors are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly than are drivers who do not.

The conclusion drawn above depends on which of the following assumptions?

Correct:
(B) Drivers who are ticketed for exceeding the speed limit are more likely to exceed the speed limit regularly
than are drivers who are not ticketed.

感觉这是个事实呀,“得到罚单的比没有得到罚单的更有可能超速”,怎么OG说它是assumption?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-6-30 00:09:03 | 只看该作者
If this is a fact, it HAS to be stated explicitly in the passage. So it is not a fact.
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-30 00:33:48 | 只看该作者
If this is a fact, it HAS to be stated explicitly in the passage. So it is not a fact.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/6/30 0:09:03)



多谢指导,
不知是我思维没转过来还是钻牛角尖了,我一直没理解这个逻辑上的先后关系,这个assumption是建立在罚单已经开出的基础上的,如果还没有开罚单,这个assumption就没有根据,就无 likely 可言。
1. 开罚单前:我假设“将来被开罚单的人”比“将来没有被开罚单的人”更有可能超速。这还用假设吗
2. 开罚单后:假设A被开了罚单,B没有,那现在罚单已经开出了,再假设“开罚单之前,A比B more likely 超速”,又有点马后炮的感觉

我是不是思维没跟上GMAT的思维呀?
抑或是简单化处理:原文没有 explicitly 提到的,都当 assumption 论。
地板
发表于 2011-6-30 01:50:51 | 只看该作者
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-6-30 15:05:31 | 只看该作者
"An assumption is an unstated premise. In other words, an assumption is a piece of evidence that strengthens the author’s argument but that the author never sates explicitly in the stimulus."

I got, thanks a lot.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-13 16:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部