ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2505|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP07 CR1中23题求教!谢谢谢~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-15 11:46:36 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
23.   (29107-!-item-!-188;#058&003854)


From 1978 to 1988, beveragecontainers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weightof household garbage in the United States. The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and glass wasresponsible for most of this decline. However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in thisperiod than glass recycling, it was found that the weight of glass bottles inhousehold garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminumcans.


Which of the following, if true ofthe United States in the period 1978 to 1988, most helps to account for thefinding?


(A) Glass bottles are significantlyheavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.

(B) Recycled aluminum cans werealmost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycledglass bottles had contained products other than beverages.

(C) Manufacturers replaced manyglass bottles, but few aluminum cans, with plastic containers.

(D) The total weight of glassbottles purchased by households increased at a slightly faster rate than thetotal weight of aluminum cans.

(E) In many areas, glass bottleshad to be sorted by color of the glass before being recycled, whereas aluminumcans required no sorting.

答案是C,选了A,但是觉得A也可以解释啊。

题目说,铝罐回收比玻璃瓶回收更加广泛(也就是说,回收铝罐更多咯?),但是垃圾中玻璃瓶重量的减少比铝罐重量的减少更多。

选项A说,相同大小的铝罐,玻璃瓶,玻璃瓶重的多。那不是,回收相同数量的铝罐,或者更多的铝罐,还是有可能玻璃瓶重量减少的更多的呀。

是不是我理解错误了?求帮忙!谢谢!!!^^
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-15 16:40:33 | 只看该作者
逻辑链:

条件1、总罐/总垃圾 ↓ ;原因:回收glass和Al→glass罐和Al罐减少

条件2、Al的回收 is more widely than glass的回收

你对结论的理解是:△W(glass)/总罐>△W(Al)/总罐→△W(glass)>△W(Al);这个时候要把重量的比较转换成体积的比较,涉及到密度,所以你选了A

但是对结论正确的理解是:△W(glass)/W(glass)>△W(Al)/W(Al)→不等式两边同时除以玻璃和铝的密度,就是glass减少的量的百分比>Al减少的量的百分比;这就和密度没什么关系了

如果按你的理解,结论应该表述成the weight of glass bottles in household garbage declined more than the weight of aluminum cans
板凳
发表于 2011-5-15 16:42:47 | 只看该作者
我有一点不明白,widely practiced和回收的量之间有必然联系吗?

为虾米widely practiced就可以推出:△W(glass)/W(glass)<△W(Al)/W(Al)?,直接说amount不行吗,无语了简直。

我觉得如果看题目的时候不能一眼看出来widely practiced其实是在说回收量的比例,后面不就杯具了吗。。。

Plus:我又想通了,题意里面这么明显的让步关系。。。
地板
发表于 2011-5-15 17:18:22 | 只看该作者
算鸟,我觉得逻辑题虽然是严格推理,但是毕竟不是数学,题干数据间关系不清楚。。。还是不要用公式解。。。

用数学思路解会杯具,因为数据定义都不清楚。。。

就按日常思维吧:本来回收铝罐更多,那铝罐就该更少,但是铝罐反而更多了。有他因增加铝罐或减少玻璃罐。

怎么觉得这题各种漏洞,各种推不出。。。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-15 21:13:02 | 只看该作者
欧。其实我数学不好,根本想不到这么多的公式啦。。。><
纯粹只是觉得CR里面好像有这类型的削弱方法。
还是很谢谢你!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-10-10 22:34
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部