ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1795|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

帮忙翻译一下

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-22 16:31:47 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1.This category, however, will not increase its share of total employment, whereas the category of high-paying service occupations will increase its share.

2.For a local government to outlaw all strikes by its workers is a costly mistake, because all its labor disputes must then be settled by binding arbitration, without any negotiated public-sector labor settlements guiding the arbitrators. Strikes should be outlawed only for categories of public-sector workers for whose services no acceptable substitute exists.

3.the best criticism of the conclusion that inducing cigarette smokers to switch brands did not pay is that the conclusion is based on figures for the cigarette industry as a whole and may not hold for a particular company
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-23 04:40:16 | 只看该作者
1,这类(工作)在总的雇佣份额中的比例不会提升,然而 (另外一类=)高薪的服务职位类工作 会提升自己在(在总的雇佣份额中的)比例。

2. 对于地方政府,宣布所有的工人罢工非法是要付代价的错误,因为所有的工作争端都必须 由有约束力的仲裁去解决,没有任何已经谈判过的解决公共部门劳动争端议去引导仲裁者,(即这些争端 不象公共部门的劳动争端,公共部门的劳动争端以前已经谈判过,仲裁者可以按先例仲裁)。只能让那些公共部门的没有其他可以替代的服务工作存在的工人的罢工非法,Strikes should be outlawed only for  for whose services .= no acceptable substitute for categories of public-sector worker sexists

3.对劝诱吸烟者更换牌子没有带来好处的结论的最好的评议 是 结论 是基于整个烟草工业的数字 ,对于特定的烟草公司,结论可能不成立。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-23 17:54:15 | 只看该作者
THX NN
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-6 15:13
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部