ChaseDream
搜索
12
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: totalgloria
打印 上一主题 下一主题

旧pp2-cr 23 怎么感觉答案不对呢~

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2017-7-27 13:42:38 | 只看该作者
黑体字部分有变化,答案c, 见gmatclub 上的讨论。

https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-product-that-represents-a-clear-technological-advance-over-competing-157880.html


A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the maximum possible price for such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

(A) The first is a consideration raised to argue that a certain strategy is counterproductive; the second presents that strategy.
(B) The first is a consideration raised to support the strategy that the argument recommends; the second presents that strategy.
(C) The first is a consideration raised to help explain the popularity of a certain strategy; the second presents that strategy.
(D) The first is an assumption, rejected by the argument, that has been used to justify a course of action; the second presents that course of action.
(E) The first is a consideration that has been used to justify adopting a certain strategy; the second presents the intended outcome of that strategy.
https://gmatclub.com/forum/a-product-that-represents-a-clear-technological-advance-over-competing-157880.html

12#
发表于 2017-10-19 11:41:35 | 只看该作者
powers 发表于 2011-4-5 01:16
BF1提出要charge maximum possible priceBF2的strategy教你怎么算maximum possible price

BF1: Because......many companies charge the maximum possible price.
BF2: Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

BF1提出目前大多数的做法是 charge maximum price(因为他们以为这样就可以最大化利润)
但实际上…………(所以这样的做法不对)因此就有了BF2
BF2 提出要 charge less than greatest possible price(只有这样才可以来最大化利润),

BF2 并不是教你怎么算 greatest possible price,

两者提出的完全是两个不同的方法,目的都是最大化利润,这很显然。
我同意楼主想法,
答案C肯定错。
13#
发表于 2017-12-6 09:19:25 | 只看该作者
痞子大哥樾择 发表于 2017-10-19 11:41
BF1: Because......many companies charge the maximum possible price.
BF2: Consequently, the strateg ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-1 19:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部