ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2222|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Passage 30/63 最后一题 逻辑support 请教大家解题思路 拜托拜托

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-22 09:36:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
第一段Since the early 1970’s, historians have begun to devote serious attention to the working class in the United States. Yet while we now have studies of working-class communities and culture, we know remarkably little of worklessness. When historians have paid any attention at all to unemployment, they have focused on the Great Depression of the 1930’s. The narrowness of this perspective ignores the pervasive recessions and joblessness of the previous decades, as Alexander Keyssar shows in his recent book. Examining the period 1870-1920, Keyssar concentrates on Massachusetts, where the historical materials are particularly rich, and the findings applicable to other industrial areas.

第二段
The unemployment rates that Keyssar calculates appear to be relatively modest, at least by Great Depression standards: during the worst years, in the 1870’s and 1890’s, unemployment was around 15 percent. Yet Keyssar rightly understands that a better way to measure the impact of unemployment is to calculate unemployment frequencies—measuring the percentage of workers who experience any unemployment in the course of a year. Given this perspective, joblessness looms much larger.
第三段
Keyssar also scrutinizes unemployment patterns according to skill level, ethnicity, race, age, class, and gender. He finds that rates of joblessness differed primarily according to class: those in middle-class and white-collar occupations were far less likely to be unemployed. Yet the impact of unemployment on a specific class was not always the same. Even when dependent on the same trade, adjoining communities could have dramatically different unemployment rates. Keyssar uses these differential rates to help explain a phenomenon that has puzzled historians—the startlingly high rate of geographical mobility in the nineteenth-century United States. But mobility was not the dominant working-class strategy for coping with unemployment, nor was assistance from private charities or state agencies. Self-help and the help of kin got most workers through jobless spells.
第四段
While Keyssar might have spent more time developing the implications of his findings on joblessness for contemporary public policy, his study, in its thorough research and creative use of quantitative and qualitative evidence, is a model of historical analysis.


8.    Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support Keyssar’s findings as they are described by the author?
(A) Boston, Massachusetts, and Quincy, Massachusetts, adjoining communities, had a higher rate of unemployment for working-class people in 1870 than in 1890.
(B) White-collar professionals such as attorneys had as much trouble as day laborers in maintaining a steady level of employment throughout the period 1870-1920.
(C) Working-class women living in Cambridge, Massachusetts, were more likely than working-class men living in Cambridge to be unemployed for some period of time during the year 1873.
(D) In the 1890’s, shoe-factory workers moved away in large numbers from Chelmsford, Massachusetts, where shoe factories were being replaced by other industries, to adjoining West Chelmsford, where the shoe industry flourished. 正确选项
(E) In the late nineteenth century, workers of all classes in Massachusetts were more likely than workers of all classes in other states to move their place of residence from one location to another within the state.
请求各位帮我看看,这道题怎么回原文定位?我根本找不到定位 所以不知道怎么具体做support 所以当时凭感觉选了E
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-3-31 15:54:04 | 只看该作者
主要在第三段。
A不对是因为,原文写的是同一时期的做同一个生意的相邻社区失业率就回不一样,A是说相邻社区在不同时代的失业率。错
B白领律师和蓝领工人失业率一样高(简单理解)。错。因为原文是说失业率会因为阶级的不同而不同
C文中无具体交代性别因素会带来何种差别,因此无法判定是否support
D,正确。定位就是Keyssar uses these differential rates to help explain a phenomenon that has puzzled historians—the startlingly high rate of geographical mobility in the nineteenth-century United States.Keyssar的不同的数据分析回答了为什么美国人民在19世纪总是走来走去的问题。D选项用了个例子来support这个说法。
E 文中的因素(Keyssar also scrutinizes unemployment patterns according to skill level, ethnicity, race, age, class, and gender),唯独没提到地理因素。因此E选项的州州的相比不会support
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-31 16:40:28 | 只看该作者
谢谢啦 原本还以为这个帖子就此沉没了呢~
地板
发表于 2011-3-31 16:47:33 | 只看该作者
you got it :-)
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-7 17:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部